Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-03.txt> (IETF Guidelines for Conduct) to Best Current Practice
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 18:04 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8307911E81C4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:04:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WUz1r3KtPVll for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:04:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22b.google.com (mail-bk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A51811E822F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:04:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id mz13so380267bkb.30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:04:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N1bVkubNtlEADo+eWZC2fJF5oapSa5RKjbLoFRtXQV8=; b=p4pRQGebNPXwbSuhYXjAoD6LGqFGPCTND/ijWOMhp+t2gXkn6VduWoyZyrj5rKvd+g iZ5WUE5n/3dnzFLSsMiB5EYprmZswnAZPC9ttvNIMfDQDrrQ67wjwF4YBv+v9j1BWXa7 WTbvaU0kHpuvttwXVUWaVYpFiBEGmSnfS8Kj4BR/btdU1shU36WRPl7MXMEtpxHaJkJX b3y3un6Z0zRXASIkj+e2OWTcP9EQ3ijvPT4Aq7tt3jus8WSZSsH1bbthR5Ksnf5h4ThV PDO4qnKPw5mgE6UE11C6RBEi1betTe4oBR6SDBrwpT7dk6uSAm7yjif+/YSDO7F9F4bx B1pA==
X-Received: by 10.204.100.193 with SMTP id z1mr2412021bkn.53.1383847479403; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:04:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.165.38] (dhcp-a526.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.165.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zl3sm3150810bkb.4.2013.11.07.10.04.37 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <527BD63E.1050200@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 07:04:46 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-03.txt> (IETF Guidelines for Conduct) to Best Current Practice
References: <20131103150309.1554.26103.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131103150309.1554.26103.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:04:55 -0000
Hi, Some comments. 1) I object to the change in the first sentence of the Introduction: "The work of the IETF relies on cooperation ..." has become "The work of the IETF relies on collaboration...". I really think that "cooperation" is a significantly better word. I want more than collaborators in the IETF (people who labor with me). I want a spirit of cooperation. Also, "collaborate" has one very negative meaning in English. (Please compare http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cooperate and http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collaborate.) 2) In the item "4. Individuals are prepared to contribute to the ongoing work of the group", I quite understand why some text was considered objectionable and was deleted. But I think the the following text should not have been deleted: "Working Group meetings run on a very limited time schedule, and are not intended for the education of individuals. The work of the group will continue on the mailing list, and many questions would be better expressed on the list in the months that follow." I would probably tune the last part so that it reads" "Working Group meetings run on a very limited time schedule, and are not intended for the education of individuals. The work of the group will continue on the mailing list, and questions can be asked and answered on the list." 3) The Security Considerations say: "Guidelines about IETF conduct do not affect the security of the Internet in any way." I'm not so sure. Try this: "Guidelines about IETF conduct do not directly affect the security of the Internet." (I thought about drafting some text about how misconduct could damage security, but I think that rat hole can be avoided in this particular document.) 4) Appendix A: Reporting transgressions of the guidelines Maybe just add a hint about the ombudsperson? "At the time of writing, the IETF is putting in place an anti-harassment policy and an ombudsperson to handle complaints." Brian
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Arturo Servin
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Arturo Servin
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… David Farmer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Ines Robles
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Dave Cridland
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Ines Robles
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Ines Robles
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Ines Robles
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184… Jari Arkko