Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-03.txt> (IETF Guidelines for Conduct) to Best Current Practice

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8307911E81C4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:04:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WUz1r3KtPVll for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:04:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22b.google.com (mail-bk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A51811E822F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:04:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id mz13so380267bkb.30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:04:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N1bVkubNtlEADo+eWZC2fJF5oapSa5RKjbLoFRtXQV8=; b=p4pRQGebNPXwbSuhYXjAoD6LGqFGPCTND/ijWOMhp+t2gXkn6VduWoyZyrj5rKvd+g iZ5WUE5n/3dnzFLSsMiB5EYprmZswnAZPC9ttvNIMfDQDrrQ67wjwF4YBv+v9j1BWXa7 WTbvaU0kHpuvttwXVUWaVYpFiBEGmSnfS8Kj4BR/btdU1shU36WRPl7MXMEtpxHaJkJX b3y3un6Z0zRXASIkj+e2OWTcP9EQ3ijvPT4Aq7tt3jus8WSZSsH1bbthR5Ksnf5h4ThV PDO4qnKPw5mgE6UE11C6RBEi1betTe4oBR6SDBrwpT7dk6uSAm7yjif+/YSDO7F9F4bx B1pA==
X-Received: by 10.204.100.193 with SMTP id z1mr2412021bkn.53.1383847479403; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:04:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.165.38] (dhcp-a526.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.165.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zl3sm3150810bkb.4.2013.11.07.10.04.37 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <527BD63E.1050200@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 07:04:46 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-03.txt> (IETF Guidelines for Conduct) to Best Current Practice
References: <20131103150309.1554.26103.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131103150309.1554.26103.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:04:55 -0000

Hi,

Some comments.

1) I object to the change in the first sentence of the Introduction:

"The work of the IETF relies on cooperation ..." has become
"The work of the IETF relies on collaboration...".

I really think that "cooperation" is a significantly better word.
I want more than collaborators in the IETF (people who labor with
me). I want a spirit of cooperation. Also, "collaborate" has one very
negative meaning in English.

(Please compare http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cooperate
and http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collaborate.)

2) In the item "4. Individuals are prepared to contribute to the ongoing
work of the group", I quite understand why some text was considered
objectionable and was deleted. But I think the the following text should
not have been deleted:

"Working Group meetings run on a very limited time
schedule, and are not intended for the education of individuals.
The work of the group will continue on the mailing list, and many
questions would be better expressed on the list in the months that
follow."

I would probably tune the last part so that it reads"

"Working Group meetings run on a very limited time
schedule, and are not intended for the education of individuals.
The work of the group will continue on the mailing list, and
questions can be asked and answered on the list."

3) The Security Considerations say:

"Guidelines about IETF conduct do not affect the security of the
Internet in any way."

I'm not so sure. Try this:

"Guidelines about IETF conduct do not directly affect the security of the
Internet."

(I thought about drafting some text about how misconduct could damage
security, but I think that rat hole can be avoided in this particular
document.)

4) Appendix A: Reporting transgressions of the guidelines

Maybe just add a hint about the ombudsperson?

"At the time of writing, the IETF is putting in place an anti-harassment policy
and an ombudsperson to handle complaints."

   Brian