Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 11/08/15 22:43, Joe Touch wrote:
> As to the process issue, I see absolutely no rationale for not opening
> this to a -bis style editing cycle except the hope of clinging to a
> already issued RFC number.

Late here sorry so just on this for now - that was discussed on the
saag list. From that and from chats with folks the main argument for
doing this in-place was that the text is considered good enough as-is
and a belief that we'd not do much better despite what'd likely be a
long and likely fractious discussion of the kind I guess you are
arguing would be better.

The RFC number was less of a deal, really, for almost everyone I
think.

S.