Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP

"John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu> Thu, 13 August 2015 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@bgp.nu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A31E1B2DFA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.354
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.354 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrLhYFR0uoQi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgp.nu (bgp.nu [147.28.0.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870831A88B1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.29.36.199] (unknown [66.129.241.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bgp.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11D466CF3B; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:06:15 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>
In-Reply-To: <55CCB357.9060402@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:06:10 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <7665B354-80B4-4C8D-8978-5E19488A4351@bgp.nu>
References: <20150810171306.11047.24159.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <C4962381-2D30-471E-92B1-C282926CB140@vpnc.org> <935C93F4-687E-4A56-A768-704D5910068E@gbiv.com> <55C92069.5020500@gmail.com> <C70EF655-BC22-408F-8375-A26AE08251F5@gbiv.com> <55C97760.4060200@gmail.com> <EC68E240-296D-44F6-8241-00687D9D992D@gbiv.com> <55CBB2C5.1080808@cisco.com> <55CCAE38.3050105@cisco.com> <55CCB357.9060402@dcrocker.net>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/x8DU_9syeLah-DfZylsJiNcLbHE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 08:03:39 -0700
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:06:18 -0000

On Aug 13, 2015, at 11:10 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> To the extent that you know of a practical line of design effort that
> can satisfy the above goal, without also creating the basic problems
> that have been documented, please describe it.

Yes, exactly. "Send code."

--John