Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 22 January 2017 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C21129872; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:31:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgIauWZHsAnu; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:30:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FE0B12985A; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:30:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id f144so8615873pfa.2; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:30:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3chv8yKGNtb14ZEMGmPFwwSFMRn9B2MMrmGMwSRdPCw=; b=vdScnARipl9X5raTEUCvkP6Iw6f1vnLiIa+9pF0rzls1BERC3vcICmV+02zewMznL0 mzrOuS0iR8NPtHk8ZXiSfBHAL88LP5RYe99Jj/pCxU6XCHqFSsCR3BobE+5UMp8hnIC1 YVHae0vjYYLhzCxARZCj1go6e1DwLvq4CfjWm7kmghmVJOlkxX5txVPmiiZfpkiYhbK6 cgcmbqA6OFi8JbDtwlpfAnl+JpD9QF+jelpOmklfWu4DbVFRIlAfApYlsc/9dT9SqDsC IRg+1yeRyM+saPWHGIxUdqUDcY751vJmcOCqM0IwXt7TsfyxG+2SKY+L4w9znfzh9ElZ I6Eg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3chv8yKGNtb14ZEMGmPFwwSFMRn9B2MMrmGMwSRdPCw=; b=AzRrKzmjFjje4/qORVkj/xbkkNnPPmSq2xkwIQXXA1t6ZaUIAYlElwfplDZclCGxhf VisC9iNFdgMS3HmElsHfJkBVE+z2Sb0ZxeZmpA5owPmqCT3taXWvW+K2BFWqEXWbfY3O PHx5EtS9Cxqcd78FHgwM9M1Aa7DV/y5trVkGHOrRrwefUK5Ue2Q6M8LCOCqkWIAMIBHU 1StMOo4+FXDEqm6W7h7QK1CF067LZub6zkMIEzkd3bQc2BP8VJZJYWSDsdYFJQv3gu38 fA3GzDPwBR6FCLdzmmWY2iHTZtlfmtUXH1lT+a46Y8mPKoYKLXBgw3TnrMoZbcaULAsw c+cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIZ8kRAVzHSGIrpUNOBl+28vHGbotutLkgjfQH+1S2stInJ6/Y3WR1JyTyWB9ZpeA==
X-Received: by 10.99.8.133 with SMTP id 127mr28813979pgi.76.1485113458347; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] ([118.148.121.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r21sm31044489pfd.95.2017.01.22.11.30.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:30:57 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <148474911031.2261.11881119527780959351.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <875519DD-685D-4642-A1D4-0F5D82502E21@piuha.net> <27F46F35-2E43-4BB8-A246-3516DA90A89D@vigilsec.com> <73B2C33B-EC3F-411E-8F2D-959C4996A3D3@piuha.net> <D536B36A-B8A6-4B89-A2CE-7AFB38C6DCE0@vigilsec.com> <41823891-E490-4A75-B707-114721B40996@piuha.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <06a96433-db10-f141-4b69-46811c0a46d1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 08:30:54 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <41823891-E490-4A75-B707-114721B40996@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dMHr6TQIoLCjMFmO-sK839k-vds>
Cc: draft-bradner-rfc3979bis@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 19:31:00 -0000

On 23/01/2017 07:33, Jari Arkko wrote:
> 
>> Text suggestions: … WG design teams [see BCP 25] and other design teams …
> 
> Close, thank you!
> 
> (But how about adjusting as follows: “… WG design teams [see BCP 25] and other design teams intended as IETF design teams …” ?)

Somebody could check with a lawyer about how to wordsmith it, but I think
it is indeed a question of intent. And maybe participants should be
advised to make their intention clear when starting a discussion, or
to ask when joining a discussion ("Hi, is this an IETF conversation
or a private one?").

    Brian