Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 23 February 2016 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27711B2FC2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id df2JHdGEWXNQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x229.google.com (mail-yw0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A4261B2FC1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x229.google.com with SMTP id h129so147433167ywb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=G4ahw32h/+veguOBGYF/w74Hvv+hdV67SEu6ZUz3ns0=; b=jBtxai3Y3lq3+2AmZ3G3tmjBHqmATmRcIlv6WBhToq5db7LqPLHVUcryXyW3fhI49J bUGg7R5KydNQBrVHNJctKhpjm/lA8dJUO7wO2QFJkiNftEvN+AcSNHktY6Zrk3XOUrm2 GfMCj6n//a9ikDzzA/FdpI9DiOlxxSQqtaCeJdkAiub3zzuv5ylTqsIamWSMfiRMLhv9 0wfMP/tGurBbbgbtwmo/sU1k4ceCKHFIDTW6f6TtMBVgeIqVP7NqTEu9dD4nrheovnwG 19WT94+ZY9gcNsrU5lHf3q58IhGdHqrUtJlKZaF+9/9tBCE+oLls6XqNggJ3hxZNYe6I YM6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=G4ahw32h/+veguOBGYF/w74Hvv+hdV67SEu6ZUz3ns0=; b=BcA9NswiBYsoD84suIowDDrNxnwecP9P7qo3p3AWk4QuKVBu7phf6R3skclelvzZBX osEtVrtYZQvHUU8ggWIKVelDrCNi92kxemwNkvd89mSuxM8kpV4aTnXSA7SrEqXuC6zo xR57C1A4gp4O8WaYuI5z/Ysj8nI1Zd+KSZ3StYOOg0C7d2IKi3WMVNVOUt5qAu6Tw7nY +I0VWppDsV6ANj4Uj8MVcDEkS1mho+O42LjFxZXtugUiWdS4z5dRK7Ju5XNYVynUuqIn hnid2a9c+0AXRITthc3S95w4eU/zSmNFF4eeu0l9L+LqdaCWSpXbrZB0NHOUtjNLP0EJ t4qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTXqshZTk4hj9jTbTHM0ER+uh3HBIhjzFfnI0KiVCl1+kId+e2wnGxaVAFeGE8FLfswqjlcfsZyRZpkvWzE
X-Received: by 10.13.202.16 with SMTP id m16mr16513936ywd.160.1456237854223; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.19.65 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:30:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56CC691D.7000904@si6networks.com>
References: <20160201142413.30288.23248.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr11tEDEPXkUWj4g_-wL=AgYRu7LYrOkgobEMtwOW4CpEA@mail.gmail.com> <003001d1687a$926ab2e0$b74018a0$@huitema.net> <56C3161F.3070301@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr15EYQdS3XR4zenqmpBn2K2Zue2a+mMz1m+Vw54ou7zZQ@mail.gmail.com> <56CB891E.6060902@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr3MdjMrMMW+Mv2n_Ls+94Ry23e8Y_LCXhH1t4nF9Rjm4w@mail.gmail.com> <56CBA305.1050400@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr3fA4+vdfUbxxxVvbpy8JRHC8TuKqXHHv6F9HBj2rL=fA@mail.gmail.com> <019301d16e1d$979ed1d0$c6dc7570$@huitema.net> <56CC3D31.6000403@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0Q6ge2qOFJ1o90mwdLr3mYEQF6uiy6=xUEgpLr-0cC_g@mail.gmail.com> <56CC5FDB.5020108@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2cBvF6eWUiKUMVi4QA81wYbu8zZUx9NdqXUwE_TdtCdA@mail.gmail.com> <56CC691D.7000904@si6networks.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:30:34 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1Cf7d4a7_7iG1cn9iXGcBE5vYkw-EWoUfVfSP5UZce+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114f00fa02e201052c70cc89
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gFXnWxYW5r0rV08mJ93iACzYgH4>
Cc: Enno Rey <erey@ernw.de>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile@ietf.org, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:30:58 -0000

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
wrote:

> > The draft doesn't say that the host shouldn't accept information
> > provided by DHCPv6. It says that the host shouldn't request such
> > information if it has all it needs from something else.
>
> Say you only receive a ULA/64 in the RA. Is that "all you needed"?

(particularly if there was a GUA available via DHCPv6)
>

I don't see what question that has to do with whether this document updates
RFC 4861 or not. Happy to discuss that question in another thread, but not
here. (The "all you needed" words aren't even in the draft - they are mine).