IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney.

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 28 May 2018 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BFB12DA15 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 May 2018 15:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8_zz9IuXNs7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 May 2018 15:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu [18.9.25.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B57B512DA14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 May 2018 15:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190c-637ff7000000405f-42-5b0c82d963e9
Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 28.8A.16479.9D28C0B5; Mon, 28 May 2018 18:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id w4SMTi9o022771; Mon, 28 May 2018 18:29:45 -0400
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w4SMTbal029747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 May 2018 18:29:43 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 17:29:37 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney.
Message-ID: <20180528222937.GA65175@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <AM5PR0401MB260963E616A6312FFE23C06EBD6F0@AM5PR0401MB2609.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B8469646E54@newserver.arneill-py.local> <HE1P190MB0122B8E77A642DEDBF4F018AAE6E0@HE1P190MB0122.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1805281046530.26368@ole-pro-2.local> <HE1P190MB012227711961EB4D4343C761AE6E0@HE1P190MB0122.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <94803d56-437b-a8d9-cdb3-c1b87fbd6e1c@foobar.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <94803d56-437b-a8d9-cdb3-c1b87fbd6e1c@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nrnuziSfa4OduOYtnG+ezWPz4cJrR gcnjafMjRo8lS34yBTBFcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGVcOPCHsaCXo2Lx0fvMDYyn2boYOTkkBEwk Dl6aDWRzcQgJLGaS6D11iQXC2cgosbD1IVTmKpPEkdY/QA4HB4uAqsTkY34g3WwCKhIN3ZeZ QWwRAWWJ9/sOsoLYzED20a832EFsYQF1iZsTvoBt4wXadr/jF9SCHcwSk48eYodICEqcnPmE BaJZS+LGv5dMILuYBaQllv/jAAlzCthJNN7+BlYuCjR/b98h9gmMArOQdM9C0j0LoXsBI/Mq RtmU3Crd3MTMnOLUZN3i5MS8vNQiXUO93MwSvdSU0k2MoDDllOTZwXjmjdchRgEORiUeXgYm nmgh1sSy4srcQ4ySHExKorzneYBCfEn5KZUZicUZ8UWlOanFhxglOJiVRHi5dLmihXhTEiur UovyYVLSHCxK4rzZixijhQTSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLIyHBxKErydjUBDBYtS01Mr0jJzShDSTByc IMN5gIbvawCq4S0uSMwtzkyHyJ9iVJQS590MkhAASWSU5sH1gtKIRPb+mleM4kCvCPN2g6zg AaYguO5XQIOZgAY/mcgNMrgkESEl1cAY0Cw462V28haNT7sOlaa3Wm/d9CuookWR98zS2JA1 TQ5+q7MaGgr5puypsVm9Zcfs6//FdJin8f6s3RsxrXOO/PP7qScP/l59UEti+XddoavWplJL KxnZ550S6xQuz74u8oHp2WxxD2dvkZf9H7tevV66V+Bqr/n9/89Wy2+8ruCr/OadapS3Ektx RqKhFnNRcSIAwFkfiP4CAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/j_ET5lkHqYxqz_qmykcYqcrZEnM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 22:29:49 -0000

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 08:31:50PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Here's what grep says about previous discussions since Nov 2016:
> 
> > % egrep -i '(IPv10|krp|When the IETF can discuss|Re: Individual Draft Submissions.)' * | wc -l
> >      271
> > %
> 
> Sergeant-at-arms, could you please do something?  This is wasting 
> peoples' time.

Well, we already had
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg102743.html
and
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg103024.html ,
and the current thread so far don't seem to support an RFC 3683
posting rights action.  I don't think that "I wish my document got
more review" is grounds for restricting mailing list posting
privileges, until it becomes abusive/inappropriate due to volume or
other issues.

So maybe you could say more on what "something" you had in mind, and
what BCP justifies it.  (I'm happy to hear that on the saa@ietf.org
list, since presumably we don't need to further contribute to the
traffic on ietf@ietf.org.)

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email