Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney.
Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 29 May 2018 10:40 UTC
Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866AB12EA7C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 03:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wDjOnJnf2qbP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 03:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C029312E894 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 03:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: ietf@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w4TAege4006677 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 May 2018 11:40:42 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be cupcake.local
Subject: Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney.
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com
References: <AM5PR0401MB260963E616A6312FFE23C06EBD6F0@AM5PR0401MB2609.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B8469646E54@newserver.arneill-py.local> <HE1P190MB0122B8E77A642DEDBF4F018AAE6E0@HE1P190MB0122.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1805281046530.26368@ole-pro-2.local> <HE1P190MB012227711961EB4D4343C761AE6E0@HE1P190MB0122.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <94803d56-437b-a8d9-cdb3-c1b87fbd6e1c@foobar.org> <m2h8mrqmxz.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <46f96301-e96d-7084-9253-404c0ceb0052@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 11:40:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/6.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2h8mrqmxz.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wXMfcd6CNpT2G3z4Oo17Zbdoktw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:40:51 -0000
Randy Bush wrote on 29/05/2018 02:18: > maybe do an actual review? There's nothing to say that hasn't already been said by many other people, but let's rinse and repeat anyway: IPv10: the proposals ignore all previous discussions about ipv4 to ipv6 compatibility schemas. There's been a good deal of discussion about this over the years, and the general opinion is that direct ipv4-ipv6 compatibility shims are unworkable for a variety of reasons. Brian Carpenter sent this helpful and constructive email in Nov 2016: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg99798.html This still stands today. KRP: describes some form of hierarchical address allocation mechanism but there are no details provided about the "protocol" itself. There isn't anything to review here because the draft has no workable content. The problem isn't a lack of reviews, it's that these ideas have been discussed repeatedly at the ietf over many years and the consensus is that they are unworkable. Khaled has not gone to the effort of looking into why they were unworkable, nor has he developed his proposals to the point that they are actually testable in a lab environment (at which point it would become clear that they are unworkable in the real world). Khaled apparently isn't interested in listening to this feedback. The feedback and reviews are there. We've had ~300 emails on ietf@, and nothing has progressed beyond what was stated in Nov 2016, at which stage Khaled was warned multiple times by the sergeant-at-arms of the time that his attempts to bring these topics up on the ietf@ mailing list were not ok: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg99875.html https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg99932.html ... hence the request for sergeant-at-arms to intervene again. Nick
- Internet Drafts' Destiney. Khaled Omar
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Michel Py
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Khaled Omar
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Ole Jacobsen
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Khaled Omar
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Nick Hilliard
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Melinda Shore
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Randy Bush
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Michel Py
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Michel Py
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Michel Py
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Lloyd Wood
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Nick Hilliard
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Randy Bush
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Khaled Omar
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Bernardo Soares
- RE: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Khaled Omar
- Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney. Benjamin Kaduk