IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney.

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Tue, 29 May 2018 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=168717744b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617FB12E894 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bARtSyWxWC8q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C8D312E058 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1527577207; x=1528182007; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=Khst5LgR XbSLPLosciQikE1eonfToBwE64ksSQAhZ7I=; b=BhUCE26bLvpj4sXQAj3MNYp4 M8zQOXQN9AKQifQXnCJy7y4Njiz3GUt9ageySNizGqIL6yGlFJSfaWRWtFrhoWko 3c0mxOqvGKD+7c03cd8tXQcVBH1WLKL7qIek3Kjth9F2A6FXbzxcmBCMhiZgiLog ac8Wke53JULj3CoTA8k=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 29 May 2018 09:00:07 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 29 May 2018 09:00:07 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.129] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50005778475.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 09:00:06 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:cc9e:a706:4113:d183
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.129]
X-MDArrival-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 09:00:06 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=168717744b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.d.1.180523
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 09:00:03 +0200
Subject: Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney.
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <8BCE0FED-090F-4DAB-B91E-D2634036E93C@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: Internet Drafts' Destiney.
References: <AM5PR0401MB260963E616A6312FFE23C06EBD6F0@AM5PR0401MB2609.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B8469646E54@newserver.arneill-py.local> <HE1P190MB0122B8E77A642DEDBF4F018AAE6E0@HE1P190MB0122.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1805281046530.26368@ole-pro-2.local> <HE1P190MB012227711961EB4D4343C761AE6E0@HE1P190MB0122.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <94803d56-437b-a8d9-cdb3-c1b87fbd6e1c@foobar.org> <20180528222937.GA65175@kduck.kaduk.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180528222937.GA65175@kduck.kaduk.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wzswNhM7rM-084D6qATPnzn24gA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 07:00:12 -0000

According to RFC3005, the discussion in this list of documents that have other venue, is not allowed.

So, if an author of IDs that have been discussed already in specific WG/area mailing list without success, keeps asking for support in the general area, it is perfectly reasonable to restrict his/her posting rights.

As in this case that was done already for some time, the next action is to increase that period of time.

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Fecha: martes, 29 de mayo de 2018, 0:30
Para: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: Internet Drafts' Destiney.

    On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 08:31:50PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
    > Here's what grep says about previous discussions since Nov 2016:
    > 
    > > % egrep -i '(IPv10|krp|When the IETF can discuss|Re: Individual Draft Submissions.)' * | wc -l
    > >      271
    > > %
    > 
    > Sergeant-at-arms, could you please do something?  This is wasting 
    > peoples' time.
    
    Well, we already had
    https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg102743.html
    and
    https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg103024.html ,
    and the current thread so far don't seem to support an RFC 3683
    posting rights action.  I don't think that "I wish my document got
    more review" is grounds for restricting mailing list posting
    privileges, until it becomes abusive/inappropriate due to volume or
    other issues.
    
    So maybe you could say more on what "something" you had in mind, and
    what BCP justifies it.  (I'm happy to hear that on the saa@ietf.org
    list, since presumably we don't need to further contribute to the
    traffic on ietf@ietf.org.)
    
    -Ben
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email