Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sat, 25 March 2017 17:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26AE1294B2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12vabaqWBv72 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEF0126CD8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03672CC5E; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 19:23:02 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RfI1WTawHz4e; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 19:23:02 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7AF2CC38; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 19:23:01 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9A537065-307F-4AB0-850F-559554F0898B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <0341FB9B-E672-400C-916E-3C6AC0685307@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:23:00 -0500
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <303E2204-762B-43A5-9469-1E063948344C@piuha.net>
References: <20170324193951.85037.qmail@ary.lan> <5DAE09F6-D7DE-47B4-ABA6-BC9A92DDEE4E@qti.qualcomm.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703241826550.72979@ary.qy> <0341FB9B-E672-400C-916E-3C6AC0685307@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/n2-7Rw8Cj2BzuD5Rtu0WdJHP_2Y>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 17:23:06 -0000
John, Pete, I think you’re diving deep into the details of one particular aspect of this problem. That’s fine, but I wanted to point out that the overall issues are broader. Even on the aspect of creating pushback for authorities generating unnecessary subpoenas, there are multiple approaches, document distribution within the leadership is just one way. And then there are other issues, worrying about the privacy of the people mentioned in any subpoena, re-examining if we could tune what information we retain at the IETF, rewriting the algorithm on what our staff should do automatically and when they need to alert the leadership, looking at what other organisations have done in these kinds of situations, and so on. FWIW, I think we at the legal committee and leadership want to be on listening and learning mode about this issue for a while before jumping into specific ways to address the issues. Keep those thoughts coming! Jari
- IETF subpoena processes update and a request IETF Chair
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Angela
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Randy Bush
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Scott Bradner
- RE: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Michael Cameron
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Scott Bradner
- RE: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Michael Cameron
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Randy Bush
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Scott Bradner
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request John C Klensin
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Scott O. Bradner
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Pete Resnick
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request John Levine
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Pete Resnick
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Nico Williams
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Pete Resnick
- IAOC membership (was: Re: IETF subpoena processes… Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Joe Touch
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request John R Levine
- Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and … John Levine
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Pete Resnick
- Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and … Joe Touch
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request Pete Resnick
- Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request John C Klensin