IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request

Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Fri, 24 March 2017 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658B3129B2B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 06:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hYuCvi8E23eg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 06:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC8912971B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 06:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5503D53093 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:55:22 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zOsSt6_GgePK for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:55:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.252.203.183] (unknown [65.112.8.196]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15C163D53085 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:55:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: IETF subpoena processes update and a request
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:55:21 -0400
References: <149033560170.22298.4992160350083194861.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <149033560170.22298.4992160350083194861.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <1F1EFD03-2C57-402D-B9B5-D5494C0146F6@sobco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rroYe03wQdPEqZmno69JIhIJJVw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:55:26 -0000

I expect that the IAOC legal committee will post the initial approach and discussion request that Jari mentioned early next 
week (well before the plenary :-) )

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email