Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-02.txt> (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 15 June 2012 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF8811E80D9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNm1Y7Is4R4J for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78CD11E8088 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [64.101.72.115] (unknown [64.101.72.115]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A613400A4; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:45:57 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4FDBA905.4060502@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:28:37 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-02.txt> (Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page) to Informational RFC
References: <20120615202915.11032.53296.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FDBA317.4010001@stpeter.im> <E550DD2D-D21E-44D0-A987-0DE391ABD7DB@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <E550DD2D-D21E-44D0-A987-0DE391ABD7DB@vpnc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:28:39 -0000

On 6/15/12 3:27 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> One possible oversight is that this I-D does not describe how the editor
>> will work on the tao-possible-revision.html file (e.g., will only the
>> editor have permissions to work on that, might there be multiple
>> committers, will it be under source control?). Are such details
>> intentionally out of scope?
> 
> 
> I would imagine that that would be determined by the IESG when they pick a Tao editor.

Fine with me. I'm not even saying this I-D needs to say it's out of
scope, I merely curious.

/psa