IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ila] [5gangip] PS draft: New Version Notification for draft-hspab-5gangip-atticps-00.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 01 February 2018 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ila@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C3412EABE; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:31:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sdzutq9TbTL0; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x229.google.com (mail-wr0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D01112EB23; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v15so19863286wrb.8; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:31:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=oYcCxOtZ8nLAA/tORyeb2ik0ykSJT6I3OPDT7jRAuL0=; b=ceq+yXYOsY1L3X3zJgjaszQU6cVnf5KhjMNb1tei7anZTPzZ0pPOu0g4CVIFLi6uxp TY+9z5Qv4OhGgO9kcNLMHdGy17keSFNOW07MBgRrGQF78BDTPqBFj5pfAQ3476e+MdaI 51soNop7Q0QAsYjYzGooa1r4aybsgo53kDNlsCAssrLSgcNhSJ9G3cACFbpU9ZxtztL0 SNr+khL8mNEtbGf934DewDoKCzm8+toA5h+6pGBScnYq96DMzrMJbBmDiwFOlSLIuxxS ptqlgcfLjgXhF+rCn9dql1jYdm6KpW3puOQPnqMJpk9w+D4NtWiF5QRmC4Obunbg3mwn p+Kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=oYcCxOtZ8nLAA/tORyeb2ik0ykSJT6I3OPDT7jRAuL0=; b=mVDxDDvKRwDgDcexJCWfJvgQfnosm7pv1TprDcDaLc7Mgud61FfDAC7+SREZvdxswQ CaqmT7BSquRj04d5qVlJljUibBUZtCWVOmPMKkrw74eaAJ3z7FSaE1tw3UGCS7W4ErAu 8J82PLFQ2BvWWdN5TBPOZVPBR/7JEChocCfdtFxukU/dP54AdKDbx1Kq/OYmvmFNM1Ea me105B5LFT93CNlqQEUy4FGjRIdshwbpKYHqMuYf9Rz9sNP6LUyrqWJeqJu5JkcoH8dr QnHhspyggrobWvS61wX4KXU8sg4KW9LAbH0X5unP6JUs7UtuZ46h9LiKEgyD9VvOaMIK 3Qjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytd7u2/+VNiVkX4Tudg1cGJX4uwAOD643tjDjpjQsmwvU4BpyOIX xmDug6rdBIuyegbNWzfhHkI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224Dzgx3Tz6Leg3H/m8AMO6po2Qr9L+Rrz7VwwoEKSc0T6G5JR4wZRTo9Pw4aSoSkYZxqqQ3IA==
X-Received: by 10.223.189.136 with SMTP id l8mr13782969wrh.58.1517506282337; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:31:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:f::1007? ([2600:8802:5600:f::1007]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b9sm542451wmc.14.2018.02.01.09.31.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:31:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <6ED79C29-FE51-4AD1-95AB-959A61006C9A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B61295EF-FBC4-485D-BF05-401132113007"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.9\))
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:31:17 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAPDqMeqAXZvFjftTs85brXmX5LhGL9gG9AoR4doaVk4JyU3DeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>, ila@ietf.org, 5GANGIP <5gangip@ietf.org>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>
References: <CAC8QAceokC+Fv5AV5KG7fB1CamstqOomOyFrNeKRQ5+sgb3T4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34GoMbt=HqHRjt_N7ZUqk=L6YNjK8qChL9oHLoFTO2hfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAccoZ9mcweHc-pqNqtsR7PRamVFaTL2_G4fJ1YTZ6gu=zw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34gEVLKzxvf08-JfvSCtptPXXi-4Qkew19JeO8fcu0+HQ@mail.gmail.com> <84E8607E-06E2-41DA-A1F6-1123E87F1E11@gmail.com> <CAPDqMeqAXZvFjftTs85brXmX5LhGL9gG9AoR4doaVk4JyU3DeQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.9)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ila/P6Nk6SBC6JergX08yxgvcgoyxSA>
Subject: Re: [Ila] [5gangip] PS draft: New Version Notification for draft-hspab-5gangip-atticps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ila@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Identifier Locator Addressing <ila.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ila/>
List-Post: <mailto:ila@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ila>, <mailto:ila-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:31:27 -0000


On Jan 31, 2018, at 2:42 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net> wrote:
> It's not the addresses that need to be obfuscated, it's the identity
> of the user that sourced the packet that needs to remain hidden.

Actually, this is among the more common justifications for IPv4/IPv4 NAT that I hear: obfuscation of the network itself.

Of course, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v26BAlfWBm8.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email