IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-12.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 20 August 2011 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112A621F876A for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjKnFbyBw7dy for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C0D21F884C for <ima@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.29.11.66] (188.29.11.66.threembb.co.uk [188.29.11.66]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <Tk=wjAALhGmo@rufus.isode.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:36:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4E4FF07C.7070407@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:35:56 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>
References: <20110708012352.14365.62590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <39219EF2FDAFC35947168EBC@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90> <513618674.27765@cnnic.cn> <DA986D019DE544E08E1FFC289FE7FA1E@LENOVO47E041CF> <54FDC38939FFB9E2DB2DE21B@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90>
In-Reply-To: <54FDC38939FFB9E2DB2DE21B@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ima@ietf.org, Jiankang Yao <healthyao@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-12.txt
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:35:19 -0000

Chris Newman wrote:

> --On August 18, 2011 14:43:37 +0800 Jiankang Yao <healthyao@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chris Newman" <chris.newman@oracle.com>
>> To: <ima@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 6:04 AM
>> Subject: Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-12.txt
>
> ...
>
>>> except the ABNF does not
>>> allow UTF-8 in ESMTP parameter values. So we need:
>>>
>>>   esmtp-value  =/  UTF8-non-ascii
>>>
>>> added to the ABNF.
>>
>> If your proposed esmtp-value syntax extension in rfc5336bis  is used for
>> ORCPT in DSN, then  RFC5336bis has already said "
>>    If a UTF8SMTPbis-aware SMTP server advertises the Delivery Status
>>    Notification (DSN) [RFC3461] extension, it MUST implement
>>    [RFC5337bis].
>> "
>>
>> Does it satisfy your expectation?
>
> That creates a contradiction. RFC 5337bis discusses using UTF-8 in the 
> ORCPT parameter value, but 5336bis ABNF presently disallows use of 
> UTF-8 in ESMTP parameter values. We can make the specifications 
> consistent by allowing UTF-8 in ESMTP parameter values.

Good point. I support your proposal.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email