Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-11.txt

Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com> Tue, 26 July 2011 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <chris.newman@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC6621F8C9B for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.099, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-uJ41z-RXCI for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sca-ea-mail-4.sun.com (sca-ea-mail-4.Sun.COM [192.18.43.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9E721F8C9C for <ima@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brmsunmail1-sfbay.uk.sun.com ([10.79.11.100]) by sca-ea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p6QE4Y7i009819; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:04:35 GMT
Received: from gotmail.us.oracle.com (gotmail.us.oracle.com [10.133.152.174]) by brmsunmail1-sfbay.uk.sun.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/ENSMAIL,v2.4) with ESMTP id p6QE4Yed016560; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:04:34 GMT
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Received: from [10.159.33.218] (dhcp-rmdc-twvpn-2-vpnpool-10-159-33-218.vpn.oracle.com [10.159.33.218]) by gotmail.us.oracle.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u5-4.01 64bit (built May 4 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0LOY0001U1RE2H00@gotmail.us.oracle.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:41:11 -0400
From: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Message-id: <F30000187D406E49FADDEBF5@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90>
In-reply-to: <4E2DE1F2.1040906@dcrocker.net>
References: <20110708012352.14365.62590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <39219EF2FDAFC35947168EBC@96B2F16665FF96BAE59E9B90> <4E2DE1F2.1040906@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
Cc: ima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [EAI] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-11.txt
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:04:47 -0000

--On July 25, 2011 17:36:50 -0400 Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> I'm only going some points needing clarification...
>
> On 7/25/2011 10:16 AM, Chris Newman wrote:
>> 3. I suggest adding a statement to the end of section 3.5:
>>
>> SMTP servers are encouraged to detect that recipients can not
>> accept internationalized email headers and return an error
>> earlier in the transaction whenever possible.
>
> MDAs are often (almost always?) the only entities that know anything
> about recipient capabilities.  The statement should probably be revised
> so that it does not confuse transit relay operators.

Often there is an MTA adjacent to an MDA that might be acting like an SMTP 
proxy or a conditional SMTP proxy. Such an MTA can get rejections from the 
MDA in response to the RCPT command.

> In addition, I don't know what you mean by "earlier in the transaction".
> Do you really mean the difference between responding to a RCPT command,
> versus a DATA command in the same session, or did you mean something
> about the mail relaying sequence?

Yes, that's what I meant.

		- Chris