Re: [EAI] Test

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harald Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: "Shawn Steele" <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
Cc: <ima@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:49 PM
Subject: [EAI] Test - driven schedule (Re: Rechartering)

> Shawn Steele wrote:
>>   
>>> But I personally think that the odds of getting a site that
>>> can't manage "john+ietf@bogus.domain.name" to be able to handle
>>> <иван@bogus.domain.name <john@bogus.domain.name>>
>>> within my lifetime are pretty small.
>>>     
>>
>> I'd agree, but john@bogus.domain.name should still work :)0
>>
>> So, I pretty much agree with your points, but you aren't giving me much hope of EAI being adaquate to those criteria in the next decade.  I still think some sort of schedule would be interesting to help us figure out how to proceed in addressing your concerns.
>>   
> Would it be interetsing to (for at least 5 minutes) explore the idea of 
> a test-driven schedule, rather than a calendar-driven one?

It is a good news. 
I think that both the test work and standard track progress work can be drivend in the parallel way.

CNNIC
Yao Jiankang

> 
> That is, specify a number of criteria that should be met before 
> standards-track, and see if we can work backwards:
> 
> tests that need to be done -> people volunteering for the work -> 
> reasonable schedule?
> 
>                    Harald
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima
>

Re: [EAI] Test - driven schedule (Re: Rechartering)