Re: [Int-area] Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Wed, 23 September 2020 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A39D3A1192 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HS1zK6jBr9ZC for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr140130.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.14.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257DC3A11B3 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OAmTbfdTTvaH8A9fjfjJLOeCdxyqp6W1PMvEVhpKlM9dHfuKfOntpB5d3DWltYuwMslJO8X0IcCI/f0I1se9qTcPahamD5M36hV9CJAvTvZHxznZeTKfehiO18SkOGIKjKfOjjwE1oLswo9tpWzIXs9+7lSraEdnkmkUjJAKSWKDztGVowCPJTSfkvw9fXNPFncLPShrNh2ShW9U/ikAYuRC2FFYUtmyEwLat4i41ZFqBUfWv1LAP/29ZnB2yQP6FuEA8nNoM1h9AwgGcAhTe1kCeEf2SGEFsC3WPUbYCr8Kj/wOecGj9fyBxl3psT6h5hbGny+R0PvwqGLVuyHW1w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9zWFGH/avPwja8ipX8RTb4yGybHefuQboGsXsVKFbD0=; b=fD/QZyjLSbspComcCI7+vPVzpZmev/s9UKPdlLGwyWbt+AF41K3h84wPE9Qm4gxLxQlM+kuiG9/PZ7mud2vuzKHJ6TD4lNYXuVdLz9jlGiSv6V9HHm6XwpfeR3LMKfZVoE1KqiGs//0TDYqankCIaHfQK2bSMfyYfnb3smkm9GNw5+2j/T1VjRQ066P/ZI80Kqq+RO0nykkYExX3fkR+EeDGCxgmFocBKZ/ByH4IakVR1WFPLBwoAVkE4LDU8Zc8kfCq026suU0CrooVYSnWrq3qpbLd0ebbA4ZhWVjnHD5QmnBiZuLS8t/XTOr+YSSPP/tfsdsJFn9yT83FqQuJ9A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9zWFGH/avPwja8ipX8RTb4yGybHefuQboGsXsVKFbD0=; b=Mk/zMYhP0CdzIB/4l8E4ZBpmQlIeN77Qyt6WaJSSisSWkPmOL0zexBDRKFxStlm+lsz46bietYpaTKEPwfw+mvPJ4un4zctwzx8WpkmppdNQVKVpleJ4YXj19e5TawHwdmCFP5mLRln+kEEcCDMu1wblf3TIe5QfDcUu6a7ljTg=
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:134::11) by AM6PR07MB4501.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:24::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.17; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:40:29 +0000
Received: from AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::189c:ac35:ce23:d38a]) by AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::189c:ac35:ce23:d38a%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3391.006; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:40:29 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Andy Smith <ajsphila@gmail.com>
CC: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications
Thread-Index: AQHWkZWtO1bJO01B6ku8BGk07BbO+Kl2QQ6AgAAaNZU=
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:40:29 +0000
Message-ID: <AM7PR07MB6248EB39DBA067989124E17DA0380@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <A8BB4316-BCAE-4E3C-AC3B-441D2ECB0338@comcast.com> <71B286E5-EAF7-4B66-A637-8EFE061D2451@gmail.com> <0F483D3B-C82B-4D00-8F0E-252CE027AE1C@gmail.com>, <4749067E-A5E1-4D22-AF80-744FA4EB8679@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4749067E-A5E1-4D22-AF80-744FA4EB8679@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.146.121.140]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9b83ac3b-3c61-41ab-8906-08d85fd6ffee
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR07MB4501:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR07MB4501427ED3844F4D4486C16EA0380@AM6PR07MB4501.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: bdvY1pFL+05/aolWxXv7+VVNDshpS82+4mvF8DicwV3xqeIs2q66utxQwUI+zI8LyfGQ0UKL8AuGnsb3tgUig2MUvdnzEpBeeRwykmdOVzp8u7TTr/PPXniNJCdZW+Bqgygr4VvmpFrEbmMeIyH8CFp8MBZPAjGPpALEk+C3Qfzq2UO5iH9oBFfGB+P4iiUlRANBJWg4LwETivevvAVxO1on4M9A6WgK44holYYPiTZSg02lQTCKA7grl/KAMrLDpLIqBn2lSi/FnbIZA6PyUAOmOtUnj9N0PqOoMHsk2s7JEJrXbeuopQS/grIIR0krhIwvxljhHiSnBtqvmA56EvztlPgNgjpswpWAPEVlim6STItckC1h/V9oSe7dM4Mp5AkpIvt3BNMTGv1Jms4FyED+e/RMU+XPteN8Wiz/GSZqqZ0XiAm3+yG4ceXUEPUjFcd1UqFsUK9Sqbkc7MQ6xA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(5660300002)(4326008)(33656002)(2906002)(8676002)(8936002)(55016002)(9686003)(52536014)(76116006)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(91956017)(186003)(26005)(66446008)(66946007)(7696005)(6506007)(110136005)(966005)(53546011)(71200400001)(316002)(86362001)(478600001)(83380400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9b83ac3b-3c61-41ab-8906-08d85fd6ffee
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Sep 2020 15:40:29.3422 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: gcU/+/qKqQVrNHWOv0vrw6LkV/A6lSgEVd7fzhgOrsHQWVKfv1UeFWdip1GwzOYhLc5vlCKADrSJlRRRSvtk1A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR07MB4501
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/1WMbkkYXTAGMSiOLIsBMxtt4Bsk>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:40:47 -0000

From: Int-area <int-area-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: 23 September 2020 15:02

In another century, DECnet phase 4 was also changing the MAC address (and if not mistaken IBM SNA also) but flipping the universal/local bit of the MAC address

<tp>
Not so much SNA as token ring which almost always used configured local addresses (which made management so much easier).  SNA did not care much about layer 2 as long as it was fast and reliable.  SNA over DIX Ethernet or over 802.3 I would expect to see using universal (burnt-in) addresses.

Tom Petch

-éric

From: Int-area <int-area-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, 23 September 2020 at 12:38
To: Andy Smith <ajsphila@gmail.com>
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications

So I am curious, and probably out of touch.

MAC addresses are supposed to be unique hardware device addresses  that ultimately come from a registry administered by IEEE and are supposed to be allocated exactly once to one hardware entity.

Is MAC address randomisation something that IEEE approve of, in which case how does the registry work, or are we at risk of working on a problem that results in an interSDO dispute?

- Stewart




On 22 Sep 2020, at 21:22, Andy Smith <ajsphila@gmail.com<mailto:ajsphila@gmail.com>> wrote:

Yiu-

I’d like to help here.   Is the problem that residential devices can’t be reliably tracked for purposes of policy enforcement?     Or is it an IP address depletion issue?

I noticed iOS 14 does allow for disabling of random MAC addresses.

Andy


Sent with emacs for iOS


On Sep 22, 2020, at 15:50, Lee, Yiu <Yiu_Lee@comcast.com<mailto:Yiu_Lee@comcast.com>> wrote:
Hi team,

We proposed a BoF. The agenda is in https://github.com/jlivingood/IETF109BoF/blob/master/109-Agenda.md and the proposal is in https://github.com/jlivingood/IETF109BoF/blob/master/BoF-Proposal-20200918.md. You can also find the draft here https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-randomized-macaddr-ps-01.

At this stage, we are looking for inputs for more use cases and interests of working together in this domain. Please post your comments in the mailing list.

Thanks


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org<mailto:Int-area@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org<mailto:Int-area@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area