IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] [v6ops] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 25 September 2020 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB6F3A02C1 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHUrbJI1Hw0H for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4173A0365 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1601016644; x=1632552644; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=AIcStNb4IvVTpuUrV9VkUVAcC8Xy03YTnp98ZLDwNdw=; b=h0WnhrI9cdWDhGcotBAKSSgLBhlsN27MyW/fatR4T2jOQ4ACxDNs0RfC uFNgbkPVe1WupugPrZegHmNcdd3f0ARV5D55fQjE0qqMNXu6mDkQOrr9t hG7X6O/WiBr/n7nEshVwDloKXj41FDEjCpMFIddUSJrmqOmakwFG9Uxml K2DeymQc/dbYFdwsu6WD3kN65ib2gJq25bJsOxWq7d7aNAL2R+cXpShVS H+TmjlWEmEVw+5VsA0BDl2t83nq1FR+UTXwr7ciWfHfFg7hUfvaRijtz8 Ir50rW3FCyqCY9l243GS8Vp0NvhB63jJaNdqH0ekHStFh3ICP7DY9JsQW A==;
IronPort-SDR: c8taPMpVxj7D3/e5dsWXFiJGlwuEMY+9lTCsmVeX5lOY5WJDQxlph6u6cbfDUa8pzm4J2oQsj4 8/uyQQ9OeX2XOPtP32cgXYR8h/fCkzgg9MVPwcdLytLfu18dKabvmAFE9LGHu2ngXb5RaAktJf HLIgNOCZngI5/UGE0B5ijzgxoMa0/Z6gL7aVdge+6GWbp5NFOtJ4lKE1RSiPvq4AgtkdpT5gdz PLaZXAF8ua+s3Hb0TuJ04JLpLhKmXQzia1Nl0uEihkDBdJFxzndbYSHpFUL1GIucjoVS1ejWyn O10=
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Sep 2020 08:50:39 +0200
X-Original-To: int-area@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A92A41CFF for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:50:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81AB41CFB; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:50:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id D19B4C91F8; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:50:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:50:38 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200925065038.GP2485@Space.Net>
References: <VI1P194MB0285F47132384AC7C0D8A8DCAE3C0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <F2516A37-06B1-44FC-850F-307114B7D6A5@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285B8AE9ACE88D1AF051ADAAE3A0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <601FB9F8-DB83-4654-B652-BE07C49F7918@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285D67301646D4383320B55AE390@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB0285D67301646D4383320B55AE390@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/iXBVRBMFybO6ifZSyR4ZT9sJvK0>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [v6ops] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 06:50:47 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:59:25PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote:
> As you know from the IPv10 I-D, it requires the network between hosts to be IPv4/IPv6 ready, so it still can be considered, as I still think that the movement to IPv6 still need some time and arrangement to get the best result for the coming generations.

The transit networks are all ready today.  If IPv6 is not available, it's 
the endpoints or the applications.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email