Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823] Missing messages from the submitter

"Jim Schaad" <jimsch@augustcellars.com> Mon, 05 March 2012 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jimsch@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B55021E8035 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:21:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, WEIRD_PORT=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jR0Z-KpxItJC for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:21:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.pacifier.net (smtp4.pacifier.net [64.255.237.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDA021E802D for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Tobias (173-160-230-153-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.160.230.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp4.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A939138EEA; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:21:37 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jim Schaad" <jimsch@augustcellars.com>
To: "'Henrik Levkowetz'" <henrik@levkowetz.com>
References: <rt-3.6.5-30123-1330814752-304.45823-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt> <FA45DA6C-AD54-499E-AE19-6DBCA00932D0@amsl.com> <CANb2OvLEh9U4bMFmQuoiu-9ohSeOqeE2vc6xx5oczvnVg1mwow@mail.gmail.com> <48471106-25E6-44A4-9639-DA7190B685AA@vigilsec.com> <CANb2OvJqKFRV9aAG3z0QJP2E+ND8JmRfkc28gqJEtaT8PnHZUg@mail.gmail.com> <4F54E2B8.8020607@levkowetz.com> <00ab01ccfb20$40822ce0$c18686a0$@augustcellars.com> <4F55490D.3080609@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F55490D.3080609@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:20:52 -0800
Message-ID: <00b401ccfb26$9bb7ba20$d3272e60$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQG+8Tk4TMKZIZ3scEwD+5OwKAdOUQG36QjhAQ+azKgB1vAEIAIeYTy4AeEBMA0CF8LLCQDxJgJPlhs0gAA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:58:11 -0800
Cc: 'Ole Laursen' <olau@iola.dk>, 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>, iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org, 'Alexa Morris' <amorris@amsl.com>
Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823] Missing messages from the submitter
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:21:39 -0000

Winery.augustcellars.com is my secondary server, I am collecting messages
from that server - so it must be deciding that you are bad juju for some
reason.  I guess that will be part of my trip to the winery later this week
to figure out what spam filter these messages are going to that is not
catching the rest of my IETF mail.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Levkowetz [mailto:henrik@levkowetz.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:15 PM
> To: Jim Schaad
> Cc: 'Ole Laursen'; 'Russ Housley'; 'Alexa Morris';
iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823] Missing
> messages from the submitter
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 2012-03-05 23:35 Jim Schaad said the following:
> > Henrik,
> >
> > Is there any possibility that an issue could be present because I had
> > multiple MX records and the primary server was down during that period?
> 
> It shouldn't matter, if you've collected messages from the secondary
server
> meanwhile.  Otherwise, it definitely could matter.  The mail server log
> showed these lines for the final delivery of the outgoing
> messages:
> 
>    Mar  2 14:17:20 ietfa postfix/smtp[32486]: 3F10E21F858E:
> to=<ietf@augustcellars.com>om>,
> relay=winery.augustcellars.com[206.212.239.129]:25, delay=31,
> delays=0.04/0/30/0.46, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0
> <20120302221648.748.41367.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> [InternalId=238]
> Queued mail for delivery)
> 
> and
> 
>   Mar  2 14:18:03 ietfa postfix/smtp[505]: 4FE2A21F859A:
> to=<ietf@augustcellars.com>om>,
> relay=winery.augustcellars.com[206.212.239.129]:25, delay=31,
> delays=0/0.01/30/0.39, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0
> <20120302221732.927.86622.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> [InternalId=241]
> Queued mail for delivery)
> 
> If 'winery.augustcellars.com' is your secondary mail server, then my bet
is
> that that's where you'll find the messages :-)
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 	Henrik
> 
> 
> 
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Henrik Levkowetz [mailto:henrik@levkowetz.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 7:59 AM
> >> To: Ole Laursen
> >> Cc: Russ Housley; Alexa Morris; iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org;
> >> jimsch@augustcellars.com
> >> Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823]
> >> Missing messages from the submitter
> >>
> >> Hi Ole,
> >>
> >> On 2012-03-05 16:08 Ole Laursen said:
> >> > 2012/3/5 Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>om>:
> >> >>> Alexa: I've tried going through a submission on my local
> >> >>> development server and sure I didn't get the confirmation email,
> >> >>> but as far as I can tell from the code, the submitter doesn't get
> >> >>> a confirmation email on submission of 00 revisions of drafts?
> >> >>
> >> >> They should.
> >> >
> >> > Ah, wait a second, there's a difference between WG drafts and
> >> > individual drafts. I do get the confirmation in the latter case.
> >> > Sorry.
> >> >
> >> > My first idea would be checking the mail logs and see if it got
> >> > lost there. I have a dump of the database, and it looks like it
> >> > went down the right branch of the code, saved the submitter email
> >> > as ietf@augustcellars.com and then went into the email sending code.
> >> > Henrik, can you check that?
> >>
> >> Just did that, and the result is that they definitely were handed
> >> over to
> > the
> >> mail server, and as far as I can tell also went out to the submitters'
> > mail server
> >> for delivery.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> 	Henrik
> >
> >
> >