Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823] Missing messages from the submitter

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 05 March 2012 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E96C21F87EA for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:52:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZMWK5BET1Fn for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:52:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D7F21F87AB for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AB6F24018; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:52:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id omcuLKRbTdmn; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:52:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.9.121] (unknown [12.54.159.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF23F24013; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:52:41 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANb2OvJqKFRV9aAG3z0QJP2E+ND8JmRfkc28gqJEtaT8PnHZUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:52:12 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <72940F67-4DF8-4EDB-849C-49102B948993@vigilsec.com>
References: <rt-3.6.5-30123-1330814752-304.45823-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt> <FA45DA6C-AD54-499E-AE19-6DBCA00932D0@amsl.com> <CANb2OvLEh9U4bMFmQuoiu-9ohSeOqeE2vc6xx5oczvnVg1mwow@mail.gmail.com> <48471106-25E6-44A4-9639-DA7190B685AA@vigilsec.com> <CANb2OvJqKFRV9aAG3z0QJP2E+ND8JmRfkc28gqJEtaT8PnHZUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Laursen <olau@iola.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com>, iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org, jimsch@augustcellars.com
Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823] Missing messages from the submitter
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:52:29 -0000

Ole:

> 2012/3/5 Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>om>:
>>> Alexa: I've tried going through a submission on my local development
>>> server and sure I didn't get the confirmation email, but as far as I
>>> can tell from the code, the submitter doesn't get a confirmation email
>>> on submission of 00 revisions of drafts?
>> 
>> They should.
> 
> Ah, wait a second, there's a difference between WG drafts and
> individual drafts. I do get the confirmation in the latter case.
> Sorry.
> 
> My first idea would be checking the mail logs and see if it got lost
> there. I have a dump of the database, and it looks like it went down
> the right branch of the code, saved the submitter email as
> ietf@augustcellars.com and then went into the email sending code.
> Henrik, can you check that?

The process I explained above in the individual draft.

The WG draft process has an additional check.  The WG chair needs to approve the posting of the -00 document.

Russ