Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823] Missing messages from the submitter

"Jim Schaad" <jimsch@augustcellars.com> Mon, 05 March 2012 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jimsch@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF9421E804D for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:36:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.134
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HCNXCYE05eFP for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.pacifier.net (smtp4.pacifier.net [64.255.237.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC0B21E8047 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:36:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Tobias (173-160-230-153-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.160.230.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp4.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9048E38F0B; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:36:07 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jim Schaad" <jimsch@augustcellars.com>
To: "'Henrik Levkowetz'" <henrik@levkowetz.com>, "'Ole Laursen'" <olau@iola.dk>
References: <rt-3.6.5-30123-1330814752-304.45823-4-0@www.ietf.org/rt> <FA45DA6C-AD54-499E-AE19-6DBCA00932D0@amsl.com> <CANb2OvLEh9U4bMFmQuoiu-9ohSeOqeE2vc6xx5oczvnVg1mwow@mail.gmail.com> <48471106-25E6-44A4-9639-DA7190B685AA@vigilsec.com> <CANb2OvJqKFRV9aAG3z0QJP2E+ND8JmRfkc28gqJEtaT8PnHZUg@mail.gmail.com> <4F54E2B8.8020607@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F54E2B8.8020607@levkowetz.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:35:21 -0800
Message-ID: <00ab01ccfb20$40822ce0$c18686a0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQG+8Tk4TMKZIZ3scEwD+5OwKAdOUQG36QjhAQ+azKgB1vAEIAIeYTy4AeEBMA2WM28vwA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 05:58:11 -0800
Cc: 'Alexa Morris' <amorris@amsl.com>, 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>, iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823] Missing messages from the submitter
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:36:29 -0000

Henrik,

Is there any possibility that an issue could be present because I had
multiple MX records and the primary server was down during that period?

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Levkowetz [mailto:henrik@levkowetz.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 7:59 AM
> To: Ole Laursen
> Cc: Russ Housley; Alexa Morris; iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org;
> jimsch@augustcellars.com
> Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Fwd: [www.ietf.org/rt #45823] Missing
> messages from the submitter
> 
> Hi Ole,
> 
> On 2012-03-05 16:08 Ole Laursen said:
> > 2012/3/5 Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>om>:
> >>> Alexa: I've tried going through a submission on my local development
> >>> server and sure I didn't get the confirmation email, but as far as I
> >>> can tell from the code, the submitter doesn't get a confirmation
> >>> email on submission of 00 revisions of drafts?
> >>
> >> They should.
> >
> > Ah, wait a second, there's a difference between WG drafts and
> > individual drafts. I do get the confirmation in the latter case.
> > Sorry.
> >
> > My first idea would be checking the mail logs and see if it got lost
> > there. I have a dump of the database, and it looks like it went down
> > the right branch of the code, saved the submitter email as
> > ietf@augustcellars.com and then went into the email sending code.
> > Henrik, can you check that?
> 
> Just did that, and the result is that they definitely were handed over to
the
> mail server, and as far as I can tell also went out to the submitters'
mail server
> for delivery.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 	Henrik