Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Bug when Adding a document to the tracker

Ole Laursen <olau@iola.dk> Thu, 23 February 2012 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <olau@iola.dk>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13DD21F8888; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:20:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.78
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.197, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SYemOrqkM5mU; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:20:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE73221F8880; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so1283886vbb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.20.78 with SMTP id l14mr1538937vde.62.1330028458260; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:20:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.96.130 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:20:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F465849.5020707@levkowetz.com>
References: <4F4415E7.9080608@nostrum.com> <CANb2OvKXRUarNY-Vp+CkA+7P5FZ1=_OfqyO67gOnKfx2bAARCQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F455B47.3040305@nostrum.com> <F3883977-5295-48A7-A226-ABCA5563A2A3@vigilsec.com> <4F45B07F.7080508@nostrum.com> <CANb2OvKJy=HT34KNFXFzN+3V6L33SgxUfxrrh_H2XufXPe6nXQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F465849.5020707@levkowetz.com>
From: Ole Laursen <olau@iola.dk>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:20:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CANb2OvJyzjgRyEt+2_cMz8nH=UfqjJ_f+2V87XYOCA8qtgPLvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/4VYtdSpLky+U980cA1Q1gHDHAawVL7GtH+R9lX1K3WT1S4dpSkrNhEDYoas5mhTqUyQQ
Cc: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Bug when Adding a document to the tracker
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:21:00 -0000

2012/2/23 Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>om>:
> Ok, so if this is used by the IESG or some ADs during the IESG processing,
> we should support it.  Do we have a straightforward way of associating a
> non-WG document with an area independently of who the sponsoring AD is?
>
> Since areas are groups, too, we should be able to have an association with
> the area in the same way that wg documents are associated with a WG, I think.

Yes. It sounds like we need to keep track of the area for a few
individually submitted documents here that conceptually belong to an
area, in the same way as WG drafts belong to a WG? Is that correct?

If so, I suggest we just associate the document with the area instead
of the phony individual group and be done with it. I can add some UI
for that. Does that sound agreeable?


Ole