IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iot-directorate] Question on IETF IOT-devices scope

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 15 March 2021 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211F83A10B7 for <iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p2HE1TY2ZRnx for <iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B72B3A10BC for <iot-directorate@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DzrF52vvhzyYL; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:09:45 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHYRG6Nhh4YZrs_0jLTyFJu5XTLLVy_SWT0+rN8EZ2JanY8UxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:09:44 +0100
Cc: IETF IoT Directorate <iot-directorate@ietf.org>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 637538984.916642-d8d45b3717533466025fc05f1151795b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C7620420-A4A4-45D7-8FDD-922C0B90C796@tzi.org>
References: <CAHYRG6Nhh4YZrs_0jLTyFJu5XTLLVy_SWT0+rN8EZ2JanY8UxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Chakrabarti, Samita" <samita.chakrabarti=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/0XFqAuenQZF5X3gnro3p-M4qGhc>
Subject: Re: [Iot-directorate] Question on IETF IOT-devices scope
X-BeenThere: iot-directorate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the IoT Directorate Members <iot-directorate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-directorate/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-directorate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 22:09:50 -0000

On 2021-03-15, at 22:55, Chakrabarti, Samita <samita.chakrabarti=40verizon.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Should IoT-Directorate members consider Thread Mesh stub networks as one of topics under IOT-DIR scope of discussion or part of IoT work?

The intention of the IETF IoT work was always to enable networks that *include* constrained devices, not to limit the work to just the constrained devices.
So I see no contradiction to discuss less-constrained devices as well.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email