IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information

Andrew Feren <andrewf@plixer.com> Fri, 26 October 2012 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewf@plixer.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1946B21F88CB for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EU6tR6BaaRdh for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.plixer.com (smtp.plixer.com [66.186.184.193]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D96421F88B7 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.37] ([24.34.46.175]) by smtp.plixer.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:16:00 -0400
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:15:50 -0400
From: Andrew Feren <andrewf@plixer.com>
To: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>, Gerhard Muenz <muenz@net.in.tum.de>
Message-ID: <CCAF4E37.114EE%andrewf@plixer.com>
Thread-Topic: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information
In-Reply-To: <5089C38E.6090603@cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2012 00:16:00.0618 (UTC) FILETIME=[14116CA0:01CDB30F]
Cc: John Court <johnwcrt@au1.ibm.com>, ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:16:03 -0000

+1
I have tripped over that wording a few times in the past.  The change from
Flow to  Flow Record is an improvement.


-Andrew


On 10/25/12 6:56 PM, "Paul Aitken" <paitken@cisco.com> wrote:

>Gerhard,
>
>If everyone's happy with this clarification, then we should ask IANA to
>update the descriptions in the IPFIX registry.
>
>P.
>
>
>On 25/10/12 19:26, Gerhard Muenz wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems that some Information Element descriptions need
>> clarification. For example, I think that the description of the
>> Information Elements flowStart* and flowEnd* should be clarified:
>>
>> OLD:
>> The absolute timestamp of the first|last packet of this Flow.
>> NEW:
>> The absolute timestamp of the first|last packet accounted in this Flow
>> Record.
>
>_______________________________________________
>IPFIX mailing list
>IPFIX@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email