IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information

Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Wed, 24 October 2012 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paitken@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687D721F8BB4 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6eKsC8OGZKa for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559D521F8AE0 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1569; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351072107; x=1352281707; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=/rvi59v51wEMcgx6Y17SYZWCIMIN6cUJ6FIPdR5F4+Q=; b=jKpqRhik7d+N9czPasWhECjhXX9e8bdbo0zKfQUd13CxXiaffpTty9P4 jLR72fqEK7iCKD+W5QgxpNlLOMmpMWa7g4gsJJiqxKHm7Y8Xur4B96wL4 g2LGO8M9YKgu50rTjWaOnSmNhH/8R5xJc0TunhX4k/A1bDOVp5i4ns/pr 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsFANW4h1CQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABEi3O2CYEIghUJAQEBAwESAWUBBQsLAwEdFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBHodcBpshoACSSwOVc4VkiGqBa4Jw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,639,1344211200"; d="scan'208,217";a="9048170"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2012 09:48:26 +0000
Received: from [144.254.153.39] (dhcp-144-254-153-39.cisco.com [144.254.153.39]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9O9mQAP030378; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:48:26 GMT
Message-ID: <5087B96B.7020500@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:48:27 +0100
From: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Court <johnwcrt@au1.ibm.com>
References: <OF96D061AA.F7F6CDD4-ONCA257AA0.00772818-4A257AA0.0078DF60@au1.ibm.com> <D50FAC55-C109-4A96-A471-538F27F9C2D9@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <OF30095AE1.689CF5C8-ONCA257AA1.001FB2C7-4A257AA1.00211D2B@au1.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF30095AE1.689CF5C8-ONCA257AA1.001FB2C7-4A257AA1.00211D2B@au1.ibm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080908000104000204030009"
Cc: ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:48:28 -0000

John,

> I suspect I have been mis-interpreting your concept of "persistent 
> caches".

In a normal cache, the entries are eventually removed - because they've 
ended, or they've not seen traffic for an amount of time, or they're 
just too old, or there's simply not enough room in the cache.

Whereas in a permanent cache, the entries are never removed.

P.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email