IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information

Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Fri, 26 October 2012 07:27 UTC

Return-Path: <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9676F21F8413 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.354, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rztX75spavLy for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0723D21F81FF for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FB7D9314; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:27:24 +0200 (MEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8hDrGVREJcq7; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:27:24 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [10.0.27.100] (cust-integra-121-161.antanet.ch [80.75.121.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: briant) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00660D930B; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:27:23 +0200 (MEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CCAF4E37.114EE%andrewf@plixer.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:27:22 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <49994E10-6179-4FB7-AD6A-7F7B06178D93@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <CCAF4E37.114EE%andrewf@plixer.com>
To: Andrew Feren <andrewf@plixer.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: John Court <johnwcrt@au1.ibm.com>, ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:27:26 -0000

Another +1.

Cheers, B

On Oct 26, 2012, at 2:15 AM, Andrew Feren wrote:

> +1
> I have tripped over that wording a few times in the past.  The change from
> Flow to  Flow Record is an improvement.
> 
> 
> -Andrew
> 
> 
> On 10/25/12 6:56 PM, "Paul Aitken" <paitken@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> Gerhard,
>> 
>> If everyone's happy with this clarification, then we should ask IANA to
>> update the descriptions in the IPFIX registry.
>> 
>> P.
>> 
>> 
>> On 25/10/12 19:26, Gerhard Muenz wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> It seems that some Information Element descriptions need
>>> clarification. For example, I think that the description of the
>>> Information Elements flowStart* and flowEnd* should be clarified:
>>> 
>>> OLD:
>>> The absolute timestamp of the first|last packet of this Flow.
>>> NEW:
>>> The absolute timestamp of the first|last packet accounted in this Flow
>>> Record.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPFIX mailing list
>> IPFIX@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email