IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Thu, 27 April 2023 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2D3C1524DE for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GpYkPYjmUprc for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA81C1522DB for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Q6f7L3ZVLz6J7Hj; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 23:00:46 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.219) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.23; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:03:57 +0200
Received: from frapeml500006.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.219]) by frapeml500006.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.219]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.023; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:03:57 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG
Thread-Index: Adlyz+lxus28Esz4Qh2x2bVDNQ8I9wGRSX8A
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:03:57 +0000
Message-ID: <5f2557ef67da455b8814bf50fb1f4bce@huawei.com>
References: <AM0PR07MB413143D679B4CDA2AF2A8D2FE2629@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB413143D679B4CDA2AF2A8D2FE2629@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.200.83]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5f2557ef67da455b8814bf50fb1f4bcehuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/-F44weP5Ng28-G1r8BuQ3bE-9Hs>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:04:05 -0000

Hi Marcus, All,
I have read both documents and I think they are in good shape. These two drafts complement OWAMP, TWAMP and STAMP solutions in order to test all the links of the LAG and not only the link crossed by the observed packet stream. These extensions fill the gap and provide a way to fully monitor the LAG through active measurements.

Regards,

Giuseppe

From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Marcus Ihlar
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 5:08 PM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG

Hi IPPM,
During the IPPM session at IETF 116 the authors of  draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag and draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag expressed that they believe the documents are ready for WGLC.
However, since these documents were adopted quite recently we’d like to ask the WG to take some time to read them and provide feedback.

In response to this mail, please indicate whether you’ve read the document along with any feedback you might have.

Note that this is not an official working group last call.

The documents can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/

HTML versions:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-01.html
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-01.html

BR
Marcus

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email