IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 25 April 2023 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D089AC1519BD for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bqj-eiuIOxOy for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38383C1519BB for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-b8f51500a82so8424312276.2 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682434833; x=1685026833; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LEeI0mqV60SoNFBUm3aj03da66heBjk1QGCAIQaWC8M=; b=VbKRhxKHA3fuaorOq1oIeTwNiOX2dDbU+qUYKVxbTDDUoPY/vGRPM4V16xNRVRr266 f/twIvRi6VWL7A6+dX7FKvr6FGfEQUrrFldIUJrcqQxhaASnjQ6sez+O4hGRN8s3u4Xi 1TtcdorXv+Jz2DgAUfD4yPlVsERtxKf9HEv1PMe1XnZ8sVVan7JCqcqJtdaAuUYTdQI9 +Ik07hG+2XxT8c45KqJDf7P2T9XbbK/ognpIEHDJ/U1yUSuHgWr9TLyOSZvS0Tj9zRCs 1nAGsi+8vHoEc1Erzsv9Dr6N7tPCH2u0F+nrYIZrZIEb9Um4+WnL11NVsxpdyJPaFg3H zDig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682434833; x=1685026833; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LEeI0mqV60SoNFBUm3aj03da66heBjk1QGCAIQaWC8M=; b=IEMIJfmbjOBa9VeGTPRsJBKnufqv08zG1akeBOPf8xoYU2vgaOB9uvaIhDtVqPVzb+ UzGQzzbjmfC62+45tufC7TG1DzBoBo3CA1I1xu2CnuGl97Jb0Rc4dpFUMdalryj9zNTV HOstG3R11Uz9+VXHQK3qjXMdhG9omv0xQynILmaOTLWLKfWqzssx1InDdUTV7LNc0mF0 kXM6EkghDoFS06TML10cHfPqfTnxwy3YUkYgR+QrsMk9jmoS7vCwfFmaP+eYyA13IhOz A6mwFJiHO3JR9f6NeH4Ucy7WjQ9ePebaUXbalSsGtgnJJ51hmSWVHu/gejFuwUDGkXMP ZpBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9d34oTn6gU/rgkKIVlPRkyc+e1AqsaXrm4dfIl5qvLcyyjdHLbC DTeREgwmfmtnz8c1C96ezYMOph9X+g/2tIDtcnbTLl3UbsM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bA5IW3hVjaY6Ik5zk69Pk+F719OB75LG7UdUFpAKzlAry+MKgOck0kuU00yujl16JZXKNBDj0HrpFajuMmCPE=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:ac1e:0:b0:b8f:6df7:8e1d with SMTP id w30-20020a25ac1e000000b00b8f6df78e1dmr12705037ybi.21.1682434832819; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM0PR07MB413143D679B4CDA2AF2A8D2FE2629@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB413143D679B4CDA2AF2A8D2FE2629@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:00:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWwaYQe6qqXpJ=64TXZaqE_62vYEWZ2CLo9siyFgs-F8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000916cc905fa2a628e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/DgwBxv7S8LX0lLPRtEhUrMA2kR4>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:00:35 -0000

Hi, Marcus et al.,
I am the co-author of both documents and hence have been closely involved
in the progressing documents. As we know, LAG is broadly used in networks
and the ability to monitor the condition over each constituent link has
been first recognized in RFC 7130 BFD on LAG Interfaces
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7130/>. These proposals extend and
complement the OAM toolbox for operatorsa using LAGs.
draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/> uses a
very elegant though simple solution ensuring backward interoperability with
already deployed OWAMP/TWAMP domains. draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag/> follows
the STAMP Extensions solution to guarantee that the STAMP test session is
co-routed on the particular LAG constituent link.
I believe that both documents are useful and are ready for the WG LC.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 8:08 AM Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=
40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi IPPM,
>
> During the IPPM session at IETF 116 the authors of
>  draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag and draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag expressed
> that they believe the documents are ready for WGLC.
>
> However, since these documents were adopted quite recently we’d like to
> ask the WG to take some time to read them and provide feedback.
>
>
>
> In response to this mail, please indicate whether you’ve read the document
> along with any feedback you might have.
>
>
>
> Note that this is not an official working group last call.
>
>
>
> The documents can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
>
>
>
> HTML versions:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-01.html
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-01.html
>
>
>
> BR
>
> Marcus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email