Re: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG

Hi WG,

As a co-author, support the publication of the document.

I think as a LAG would have a number of member links, it may be cumbersome
to configure each member link and hence the proposed mechanism can help in
that case.

I think the document has several places with some procedure described for
Reflector, but I think it would apply to stateful Reflector and not
stateless Reflector.

Examples:
Section2:

Both the micro STAMP Session Sender and

   Reflector MUST use SSID to correlate the Test packet to a micro

   session.

Section 3:

The micro Session Reflector can verify whether the

   test packet is received from the expected member link.

thanks,

Rakesh

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:08 AM Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=
40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi IPPM,
>
> During the IPPM session at IETF 116 the authors of
>  draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag and draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag expressed
> that they believe the documents are ready for WGLC.
>
> However, since these documents were adopted quite recently we’d like to
> ask the WG to take some time to read them and provide feedback.
>
>
>
> In response to this mail, please indicate whether you’ve read the document
> along with any feedback you might have.
>
>
>
> Note that this is not an official working group last call.
>
>
>
> The documents can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
>
>
>
> HTML versions:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-01.html
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-01.html
>
>
>
> BR
>
> Marcus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>