IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG

guo.jun2@zte.com.cn Tue, 25 April 2023 10:37 UTC

Return-Path: <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEBFC151522 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.884
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.884 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mTBO8zyCoUh8 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4540C14CF05 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4Q5JN7209lz5B14p; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:37:11 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app06.zte.com.cn ([10.55.23.119]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 33PAb6Lu011773; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:37:06 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from guo.jun2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:37:09 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:37:09 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af96447ad55ffffffff8f0-ace02
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202304251837093169310@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: guo.jun2@zte.com.cn
To: marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 33PAb6Lu011773
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6447AD57.000/4Q5JN7209lz5B14p
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/EtPavj7wTcPRcyN8-psGF_UTU9g>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 10:37:19 -0000

As co-author, I've read these documents. The contents are complete and valuable. We have implemented the functions involved in this draft, and have conducted interoperability tests . 


























郭俊


软件平台开发一部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 





中兴通讯股份有限公司


南京市雨花台区紫荆花路68号南研一期2楼，210012


T: xxxxxxx     M: 18105183663


E: guo.jun2@zte.com.cn













Original



From: MarcusIhlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>;
Date: 2023年04月19日 23:08
Subject: [ippm] Request for reviews of OWAMP/TWAMP/STAMP on LAG


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

 

Hi IPPM,


During the IPPM session at IETF 116 the authors of  draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag and draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag expressed that they believe the documents are ready for WGLC.


However, since these documents were adopted quite recently we’d like to ask the WG to take some time to read them and provide feedback.


 


In response to this mail, please indicate whether you’ve read the document along with any feedback you might have.


 


Note that this is not an official working group last call.


 


The documents can be found here:


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag/


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/


 


HTML versions:


https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-on-lag-01.html


https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-01.html


 


BR


Marcus

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email