Re: [ippm] Fwd: Expiration impending: draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Mon, 09 January 2012 09:18 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D0021F85E9 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:18:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfWqa9T-38Yb for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:18:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-vbr18.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr18.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.38]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073B521F8536 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 01:18:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr18.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q099HgJd034871 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:17:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4F0AB0B5.1050702@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:17:41 +0100
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
References: <20120102124204.27668.58844.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F01B330.4080806@uijterwaal.nl> <201201071525.q07FPnTL003595@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <201201071525.q07FPnTL003595@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: Expiration impending: draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:18:17 -0000

IPMM Group,

Al: thanks for updating the draft.

> As promised, here's the update of reporting metrics where we've
> finished section 6 based on recent measurement and reporting
> experience. Also checked nits and the list (discussion of this
> draft has been rather long-term, dating back many years).

Group:

If I read the draft correctly, the only section with open issues is
6.6.1.  The current text is a summary of possibilities.  If you feel
that this is not enough, please comment.  If not, we go to WGLC with
the document.

Al:

If I missed anything still to be discussed, please speak up.

Henk




-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)