Re: [ippm] Wrapping up

Henk

I am still interested in working on the packet trains issue 
(insofar as it related to measuring available bandwidth)
and the TWAMP issues I raised in the past.

I haven't had free cycles to get down to writing anything,
but was planning doing so before the next meeting.

Y(J)S

-----Original Message-----
From: ippm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henk Uijterwaal
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:32
To: IETF IPPM WG
Subject: [ippm] Wrapping up

IPPM,

One of my new year's resolutions was to wrap up the work of this group.  Besides
the 2 drafts that were recently updated, there are these little items left on
our plate:

1. Draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt:
   There were some comments raised on WGLC.  Authors: please take a look at the
   archives and respond to them.

2. RFC5136 update RFC
   In Quebec, there was a proposal for an update draft from, IIRC, some of the
   Ericsson folks.  Nothing has happened since then, if people still feel that
   this document is needed, speak up.

3. TWAMP.
   a. Packet trains.  There has been some discussion on this with the conclusion
      that we need a document to specify what problem we want to solve .  Nobody
      took any action so-far.
   b. Yakov raised some issues with TWAMP in Prague but there was no follow-up,
      I suggest to table this.
   c. There is a suggestion to rewrite the entire spec, but as there is little
      momentum to work on (a) and (b), I suggest to table this as well.
   d. An Interop event has been mentioned, has there ever been one and did
      anything come out of it that is of interest to the group.

4. Draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01
   This is ongoing work (and meanwhile a WG doc) which we'll keep going.

If you are interested in working on any of these topics in the near future,
speak up now.  If nobody speaks up by January 23, 2012, I'm going to declare
them dead.  The near future is defined here as "the Paris IETF meeting",
that is, if you are interested in any of these topics, you don't have to
do anything by January 23, but I do expect significant progress on a topic
by Paris.

Henk

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm