Re: [ippm] Wrapping up

Henk Uijterwaal <henk.uijterwaal@gmail.com> Tue, 24 January 2012 11:01 UTC

Message-ID: <4F1E8F8C.3050904@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:01:32 +0100
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk.uijterwaal@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ippm@ietf.org
References: <4F0AB41C.9040605@uijterwaal.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4F0AB41C.9040605@uijterwaal.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [ippm] Wrapping up
Precedence: list
Reply-To: henk@uijterwaal.nl

IPPM Group,

On 09/01/2012 10:32, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
> 1. Draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt:
>    There were some comments raised on WGLC.  Authors: please take a look at the
>    archives and respond to them.

I have not seen any action so this topic is dead.

> 2. RFC5136 update RFC
>    In Quebec, there was a proposal for an update draft from, IIRC, some of the
>    Ericsson folks.  Nothing has happened since then, if people still feel that
>    this document is needed, speak up.

I have not seen any action so this topic is dead.

> 3. TWAMP.
>    a. Packet trains.  There has been some discussion on this with the conclusion
>       that we need a document to specify what problem we want to solve .  Nobody
>       took any action so-far.

Two things happened here:

* A request to publish draft-baillargeon-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets-02.txt

* Draft-morton-ippm-rate-problem-01.txt was published.
  Please comment on this document.

>    b. Yakov raised some issues with TWAMP in Prague but there was no follow-up,
>       I suggest to table this.

This will remain on the active list for now, as Yakov has indicated that he will
do work on this before Paris.

>    c. There is a suggestion to rewrite the entire spec, but as there is little
>       momentum to work on (a) and (b), I suggest to table this as well.
>    d. An Interop event has been mentioned, has there ever been one and did
>       anything come out of it that is of interest to the group.

Apparently not, so no follow up needed.

> 
> 4. Draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01
>    This is ongoing work (and meanwhile a WG doc) which we'll keep going.

5. Other work:

* draft-cisco-sla-protocol-00.txt
* draft-ionta-new-multiparty-metrics-framework-00

If you are interested in either draft, please speak up.

Henk


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)

[ippm] Wrapping up Henk Uijterwaal
Re: [ippm] Wrapping up Murtaza Chiba
Re: [ippm] Wrapping up Henk Uijterwaal
Re: [ippm] Wrapping up Ruediger.Geib
[ippm] Comments on draft-cisco-sla-protocol- [was… Al Morton
[ippm] Rate Measurement Problem [was: Re: Wrappin… Al Morton
[ippm] Rate Measurement Problem Henk Uijterwaal
Re: [ippm] Comments on draft-cisco-sla-protocol- … Greg Dowd
Re: [ippm] Comments on draft-cisco-sla-protocol- … Al Morton
Re: [ippm] Wrapping up Yaakov Stein
[ippm] Standards Track Advancement [was Re: Wrapp… Al Morton
[ippm] R: Wrapping up Ionta Tiziano
Re: [ippm] Comments on draft-cisco-sla-protocol- … Murtaza Chiba
Re: [ippm] R: Wrapping up Murtaza Chiba
Re: [ippm] Wrapping up Henk Uijterwaal