Re: [ippm] Wrapping up

Hello All,
     Happy new year to all. We (the authors) would love to hear comments on
the Cisco SLA Protocol draft. The related IPR statement has been sent to
the list just before the new year. The IPR statement, in brief, is a
defensive non-discriminatory clause.

Draft:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cisco-sla-protocol-00.txt

IPR Statement:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1659/

Thanks and Regards,
-murtaza

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> wrote:

> IPPM,
>
> One of my new year's resolutions was to wrap up the work of this group.
>  Besides
> the 2 drafts that were recently updated, there are these little items left
> on
> our plate:
>
> 1. Draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt:
>   There were some comments raised on WGLC.  Authors: please take a look at
> the
>   archives and respond to them.
>
> 2. RFC5136 update RFC
>   In Quebec, there was a proposal for an update draft from, IIRC, some of
> the
>   Ericsson folks.  Nothing has happened since then, if people still feel
> that
>   this document is needed, speak up.
>
> 3. TWAMP.
>   a. Packet trains.  There has been some discussion on this with the
> conclusion
>      that we need a document to specify what problem we want to solve .
>  Nobody
>      took any action so-far.
>   b. Yakov raised some issues with TWAMP in Prague but there was no
> follow-up,
>      I suggest to table this.
>   c. There is a suggestion to rewrite the entire spec, but as there is
> little
>      momentum to work on (a) and (b), I suggest to table this as well.
>   d. An Interop event has been mentioned, has there ever been one and did
>      anything come out of it that is of interest to the group.
>
> 4. Draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01
>   This is ongoing work (and meanwhile a WG doc) which we'll keep going.
>
> If you are interested in working on any of these topics in the near future,
> speak up now.  If nobody speaks up by January 23, 2012, I'm going to
> declare
> them dead.  The near future is defined here as "the Paris IETF meeting",
> that is, if you are interested in any of these topics, you don't have to
> do anything by January 23, but I do expect significant progress on a topic
> by Paris.
>
> Henk
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
>                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
>                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
>                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>