Re: [ippm] R: Wrapping up

[Murtaza Chiba <[e-mail]>]

Hello Tiziano,
    We would love to hear from you. Please do send us your comments.

Regards,
-murtaza


On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Ionta Tiziano <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> IPPM,
> I'm strongly interested in draft-cisco-sla-protocol-00, since I've been
> hardly working (as Service Provider) on Cisco IPSLA for 6 years, collecting
> many feedbacks and enhancement proposals about it.
> Therefore I believe this draft (to be maintained inside the IPPM WG) would
> be the right place to gather my work mentioned above and share it with the
> IPPM WG.
> In order to actively participate in the draft-cisco-sla-protocol-00 review
> I just need some more time to deeply analyze it and to wrap up my last 6
> years notes about it.
> Tiziano
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] Per conto di
> Henk Uijterwaal
> Inviato: martedì 10 gennaio 2012 8.21
> A: [e-mail]
> Oggetto: Re: [ippm] Wrapping up
>
> Murtaza,
>
> >      Happy new year to all. We (the authors) would love to hear comments
> on the
> > Cisco SLA Protocol draft. The related IPR statement has been sent to the
> list
> > just before the new year. The IPR statement, in brief, is a defensive
> > non-discriminatory clause.
>
> Happy new year to you too.  I suggest to follow the same approach for this
> as
> for the other open items.  If people in the IPPM WG are interested in this
> topic and have cycles to work on it, speak up in the next 2 weeks, if not,
> we
> should discuss where this draft fits best.  We is defined as you plus
> fellow
> authors, the AD and IPPM chairs.
>
> Henk
>
>
> >
> > Draft:
> > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cisco-sla-protocol-00.txt
> >
> > IPR Statement:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1659/
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > -murtaza
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Henk Uijterwaal <[e-mail]
> > <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> >
> >     IPPM,
> >
> >     One of my new year's resolutions was to wrap up the work of this
> group.  Besides
> >     the 2 drafts that were recently updated, there are these little
> items left on
> >     our plate:
> >
> >     1. Draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt:
> >       There were some comments raised on WGLC.  Authors: please take a
> look at the
> >       archives and respond to them.
> >
> >     2. RFC5136 update RFC
> >       In Quebec, there was a proposal for an update draft from, IIRC,
> some of the
> >       Ericsson folks.  Nothing has happened since then, if people still
> feel that
> >       this document is needed, speak up.
> >
> >     3. TWAMP.
> >       a. Packet trains.  There has been some discussion on this with the
> conclusion
> >          that we need a document to specify what problem we want to
> solve .  Nobody
> >          took any action so-far.
> >       b. Yakov raised some issues with TWAMP in Prague but there was no
> follow-up,
> >          I suggest to table this.
> >       c. There is a suggestion to rewrite the entire spec, but as there
> is little
> >          momentum to work on (a) and (b), I suggest to table this as
> well.
> >       d. An Interop event has been mentioned, has there ever been one
> and did
> >          anything come out of it that is of interest to the group.
> >
> >     4. Draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-01
> >       This is ongoing work (and meanwhile a WG doc) which we'll keep
> going.
> >
> >     If you are interested in working on any of these topics in the near
> future,
> >     speak up now.  If nobody speaks up by January 23, 2012, I'm going to
> declare
> >     them dead.  The near future is defined here as "the Paris IETF
> meeting",
> >     that is, if you are interested in any of these topics, you don't
> have to
> >     do anything by January 23, but I do expect significant progress on a
> topic
> >     by Paris.
> >
> >     Henk
> >
>
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle
> persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante
> dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora
> abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di
> darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua
> distruzione, Grazie.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged
> information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying,
> printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and
> advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>