Re: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Mon, 05 September 2022 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6938EC1524C7 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UuY-8M4ebtV8 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43FBEC1522C3 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MLTs60p7nz8R039; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:28:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp04.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.203]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 2850SHZH051163; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:28:17 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:28:16 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:28:16 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af9631542a032de48ac
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202209050828169811883@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <1BCD27D1-4A44-4FF1-BD91-C6B78F0F03A3@apple.com>
References: 1BCD27D1-4A44-4FF1-BD91-C6B78F0F03A3@apple.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 2850SHZH051163
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 631542BA.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1662337722/4MLTs60p7nz8R039/631542BA.000/10.5.228.82/[10.5.228.82]/mse-fl2.zte.com.cn/<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 631542BA.000/4MLTs60p7nz8R039
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/grxzubuSZfY9DRu_UJOpd_KlTHA>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 00:28:45 -0000

I support WG adoption of this draft (as a co-author).

Best Regards,
Xiao Min
------------------Original------------------
From: TommyPauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>;
Date: 2022年09月02日 01:27
Subject: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

Hello IPPM,

As discussed at IETF 114, we’re starting an adoption call for Precision Availability Metrics for SLO-Governed End-to-End Services, draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam/

The current version is here:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam-02.html

Please reply to this email by Thursday, September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of this draft.

Best,
Tommy & Marcus