IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Mon, 05 September 2022 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1A6C152593 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crn4XWl4OWfO for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 263CFC1524BA for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MLTqc5SCRz5BNS0 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:27:24 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MLTq248Qpz501TH; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:26:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 2850QjrV049587; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:26:45 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 08:26:45 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:26:45 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af963154245ffffffffaf7e3078
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202209050826451251876@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 2850QjrV049587
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.138.novalocal with ID 6315426C.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1662337644/4MLTqc5SCRz5BNS0/6315426C.000/192.168.251.13/[192.168.251.13]/mxct.zte.com.cn/<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6315426C.000/4MLTqc5SCRz5BNS0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/wZqbA0TjaCCQlYa62XppalYAsZY>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 00:27:31 -0000

I support WG adoption of the PM on LAG drafts.
I believe it's a good starting point in this field.

Best Regards,
Xiao Min
------------------Original------------------
From: MarcusIhlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>;
Date: 2022年09月02日 00:44
Subject: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

Hello IPPM,
This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group for the draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag documents. These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support  performance measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.
The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
Please reply to this email by Thursday September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of these documents.
BR
Marcus & Tommy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email