Re: [ippm] Call for Adoption of draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam

I also support the adoption of this draft.
Thanks
Hesham

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022, 10:54 PM Alexander L Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org> wrote:

> Dear Tommy, Marcus, all,
>
> +1 to Greg's eloquent explanation.
>
> As a coauthor, I support the IPPM WG adopting this draft.
>
> --- Alex
> On 9/2/2022 8:44 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
>
> Dear Tommy, Marcus et al.,
> as the co-author, I support the IPPM WG adopting this work.
> As you recall, this draft is the result of merging two proposals that were
> presented and discussed over several IETF meetings. Over the course of
> these discussions, we've addressed exceptionally helpful comments from Med
> and Adrian. Their comments helped to clarify several aspects further. I
> hope that the WG agrees that the draft addresses an important problem and
> already presents a solid foundation for the solution.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 10:26 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
> 40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello IPPM,
>>
>> As discussed at IETF 114, we’re starting an adoption call for Precision
>> Availability Metrics for SLO-Governed End-to-End Services,
>> draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam/
>>
>> The current version is here:
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mhmcsfh-ippm-pam-02.html
>>
>> Please reply to this email by *Thursday, September 15*, to indicate
>> whether you support adoption of this draft.
>>
>> Best,
>> Tommy & Marcus
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing listippm@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>