IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] draft-baillargeon-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Tue, 10 May 2011 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40540E0780 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 01:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.282
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.282 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.222, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3EZgEtBiuYMD for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46075E076E for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 01:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4A8dUfU045060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 May 2011 10:39:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4DC8F9C1.2090705@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:39:29 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Baillargeon <steve.baillargeon@ericsson.com>
References: <4383945B8C24AA4FBC33555BB7B829EF0DEC351277@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <4D9D7225.6080506@uijterwaal.nl> <4DB95371.4070905@uijterwaal.nl> <4383945B8C24AA4FBC33555BB7B829EF0DECEDEDDD@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4383945B8C24AA4FBC33555BB7B829EF0DECEDEDDD@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] draft-baillargeon-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 08:40:04 -0000

(Catching up on this)

On 28/04/2011 14:52, Steve Baillargeon wrote:

> Hi The draft proposes to enhance the TWAMP control protocol with a new mode
> and add the less possible set of new fields to the TWAMP test packets. The
> objective is to allow a single test session of a given type-P to measure
> capacity metrics over time on a given path using any capacity estimation
> methods. Can someone tell me if there is anything wrong with such goal?

No, not at all and I did not want to imply this.

Henk


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email