IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Issue found in RFC 3667 text

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Thu, 29 April 2004 14:30 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (www.iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05490 for <ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJCOq-000625-K8 for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:20:28 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3TEKSGo023183 for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:20:28 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJCH7-0001bV-9z for ipr-wg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:12:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA03860 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:12:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJCGw-00025C-Cz for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:12:18 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJCG4-0001qL-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:11:25 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJCFd-0001bj-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:10:57 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJC2H-0001tO-Sp; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:57:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJBqw-0007KI-GW for ipr-wg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:45:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA01630 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:45:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJBql-00033r-Og for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:45:15 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJBpq-0002pq-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:44:18 -0400
Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJBpF-0002b0-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:43:42 -0400
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3TDfM429616; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:41:22 +0300
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:41:22 +0300
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
cc: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Issue found in RFC 3667 text
In-Reply-To: <4090F867.4090306@zurich.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404291639290.29592-100000@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Pekka, that isn't the answer. You have no concept of how long it takes
> to negotiate the fine details of disclosures with corporate lawyers.
> Fixing the way the IETF handles incoming notices is not the point.

When you get a fine idea you want to document, and consider finding 
enough time to write it just before the cut-off date, go talk to the 
lawyers then, not at the cut-off date ?

> If you want critical documents to be submitted before the I-D cutoff
> date, there has to be some wiggle room here. The boilerplate above
> provides that wiggle room. 

It also provides (too much) wiggle room to the other direction.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email