IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IPsec Digest, Vol 123, Issue 21

Les Leposo <leposo@gmail.com> Tue, 19 August 2014 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <leposo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3242B1A03AC for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UeGrYXg3mdwA for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E46781A8938 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so5566246wiv.5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EIF4NY4b1J0fsQL9I//cF8a7XCrnu1iwaKaR6E1Atjs=; b=lf6im8ja/QVVwOYNIjGIYvIrw5lopXfxb0lR/yr5ZWm0b8BhFRgqsHXDJtYIpsm55h /W3hddsI4y7mtCNRtz/SDSbx0mU8ZzTy1Cfq5EYzSMr6Kxnf/TYGltIU39CN2SZIO+4u MN7EocVZgEW4f6Iysus7WeMG7ZQdVtVT9aYLWjlUph6CXRW8LjDOG65UFGO1bh1X5z0p 7lyP1hoM2KwYZxk4SE5FW1NXuy7Zc2bPePcX6LrTsOvcqHPUIpqsLP8OejBsb5eIjMQO djGgCWs9ZGZDuu2CfndKIdjG1IbPVHDmPB6Pygbo6aVxQsvw0bjD3R54Q1wjPTid+6bj qYwQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.10.166 with SMTP id j6mr7410454wib.73.1408460181622; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.17] ([197.237.48.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wi9sm51017429wjc.23.2014.08.19.07.56.19 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Les Leposo <leposo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408191042460.19423@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:56:16 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <47C1A4D5-966E-477D-AF81-D2CB92ECA031@gmail.com>
References: <mailman.4236.1406823571.13632.ipsec@ietf.org> <A0463391-0BB4-408F-874B-A6B91ED6D102@gmail.com> <21490.4420.127387.489490@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408181229340.25715@bofh.nohats.ca> <50B02F3B-2DA2-42D1-865E-9635A4D928BA@gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408181351270.27621@bofh.nohats.ca> <EA6BA2C5-112E-431A-B128-B9E856641DB8@gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408191042460.19423@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/3cmK5C-cCXIhglGnDteqE9aGGIQ
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsec Digest, Vol 123, Issue 21
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:56:25 -0000

On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:43 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Les Leposo wrote:
> 
>>> the entire ipsec system is brought down/up, eg racoon is completely
>>> killed and restarted all the time.
>> Sounds like a totally reproducible crash/signal.
>> 
>> I'm sure if you file a radar with the procedure of how to reproduce (including connection duration & user activity), may be even a test account on your server, a developer on that end can gdb their way to the fix.
>> 
>> You would also have to indicate how long this problem has been happening e.g. years/months, ios versions (to identify regressions).
> 
> Years ago I tried to file bug reports for IPsec to Apple. No feedback
> ever, and lots of "developer" spam email.
> 
How long ago? 

Is this around the question of keeping the tunnel up while the screen is passcode-locked (as alluded by Yoav)?

And do you have the radar numbers?

> If Apple cares, they can contact me to convince me the process changed.
> But from what I'm hearing, if you're not doing millions in revenue, you
> don't really get their attention whatsoever.
> 
> Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email