IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IPsec Digest, Vol 123, Issue 21

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 18 August 2014 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20A51A070A for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R5W50UjIi9B0 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0201A0708 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B68B813B2; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:52:06 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1408384326; bh=a90msIDOaCEhnN9rOfzvdYYXRcP6NxH0QMA5R1J5Bf0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=XG2Zer19Fy7jnas86NKjXnuVfoaGkk3S2AHEjcdsP9jM1gkwxeyYvDU3HRsORgaXo 1BEAKGhwxaURQyUjOZ9MZg6XWf5g11C0Or8vISHlCXvtM2HQUBRmEUTr8fPCxd+L9j bnzuZVHb9ihu64GGQDJ3Ixc8/r5Tcr894eW4Rv/I=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s7IHq526027648; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:52:05 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:52:05 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Les Leposo <leposo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50B02F3B-2DA2-42D1-865E-9635A4D928BA@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408181351270.27621@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <mailman.4236.1406823571.13632.ipsec@ietf.org> <A0463391-0BB4-408F-874B-A6B91ED6D102@gmail.com> <21490.4420.127387.489490@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408181229340.25715@bofh.nohats.ca> <50B02F3B-2DA2-42D1-865E-9635A4D928BA@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/njwKOJ5kQSvSnDM8zXjryCNEdLg
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsec Digest, Vol 123, Issue 21
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:52:08 -0000

On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Les Leposo wrote:

>>> If course if the device is not really sleeping, i.e. you just blank
>>> the screen, and are still able to receive and send packets, then there
>>> is no point of tearing down the IKE SA.
>>
>> could someone at apple please relay this! This is stupidly draining my
>> battery :P
> do you know if it is an IKE SA rekey and if so, who is actually initiating it?

the entire ipsec system is brought down/up, eg racoon is completely
killed and restarted all the time.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email