Re: [IPsec] IPsec Digest, Vol 123, Issue 21

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 19 August 2014 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C93B1A8918 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NZ8rmFOaFaGO for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642131A8916 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FC281790; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1408459349; bh=SajG/bVH0vO61BqLLda22RnQ+78Yuob+hcpu+pha44o=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=jlgfN41xu9hwr+88IysYo7uFK/2YGYa6YmfI+aBnVb4F3MSpfp+e858tZ30fl1bKN ercZDdSVGi3oQw4ZIUNKTNIZs0UXCTYeoJBq2IKVhQpuUjLEMUSuGJ7lf+fZvIPg/h nzfYG0ieJiMIpUGiFswuGmiGnW1H2Cnc68H8zMiQ=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s7JEgThE020762; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:42:29 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:42:29 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <21491.9709.148603.972986@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408191041490.19423@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <mailman.4236.1406823571.13632.ipsec@ietf.org> <A0463391-0BB4-408F-874B-A6B91ED6D102@gmail.com> <21490.4420.127387.489490@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1408181229340.25715@bofh.nohats.ca> <21491.9709.148603.972986@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/BegxRNYgd78kwwHqDQ5NgkZTzdI
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, Les Leposo <leposo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsec Digest, Vol 123, Issue 21
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:42:33 -0000

On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Tero Kivinen wrote:

>> You would need the port number too to support multple clients behind the
>> same NAT router, upon which the attacker can then use multiple ports too.
>
> No need for port number. If server is under attack just block / slow
> down everybody using the same IP-address (or IP-address mask).

Works great with CGN :P

Paul