[IPsec] Call for adoption: The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Thu, 11 September 2014 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315481A8934 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 04:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wODN5hTc70Cf for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 04:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9275F1A8930 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 04:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s8BB6Axh007977 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:06:10 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s8BB6AjP023617; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:06:10 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21521.33314.11281.192320@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:06:10 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <540CA9B2.3090807@gmail.com>
References: <540CA9B2.3090807@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 2 min
X-Total-Time: 2 min
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/78XNkE_IZ9YzAfzYP9vJrlc4PvE
Cc: ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPsec] Call for adoption: The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:06:14 -0000

Yaron Sheffer writes:
> This is a call for adopting draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth as a 
> WG document. Please respond to this mail with a Yes or No and a short 
> rationale, at latest by Friday Sep. 12.

I have not really had time to concentrate on this topic yet, but I
think this kind of extension would be useful, and I especially think
one way authentication would be useful in the IoT contexts. I am not
that convinced that no authentication at all is that useful, but I
might be wrong (there are complicated policy issues with that, which
might require more work).

I support taking this document as WG document (i.e. as first version,
that can then be worked on later). 
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi