Re: [IPsec] Call for adoption: The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 09 September 2014 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E141A0B78 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 00:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t6VnzlMP-w1Y for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F6B1A0B75 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 00:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id em10so14987wid.0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Auwgj8x8Hi5l2bEpwQVOFoVbict+fCxUraRwWLdqciE=; b=aCZF33D1KeuxnFpezS6jJBcGajmx4siyJGhzgj52tv92mA6ti4Gsupc56C8BNF2r97 UtvS03Il0T5aSZzjnAneUiPwkPgi87RBnfMdS4pR7//App8RvdBQX8vrME0RQBIgahjk oNe5gjj2ZhTEEJg49o0pg0e/gmh5X9q6iCkFJHLN3pxfjE/Pb5k4+XsZ2s9uqtIUeyrB bDB+Ibbh04LWfP02QlOK11nJktySX0YwHJ+KhzSPNP/TCyNQq+wyw4kZvOuzDwH5nSGN g0HWfY3X5/PY0aIk0uZRG0q/m0D0GOr3di8yAHZxeL9w1BHSFLrDCVg6vFMYSfFMiCES 4cdA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.63.205 with SMTP id i13mr40847190wjs.74.1410248520134; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.137.67 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 00:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <540CA9B2.3090807@gmail.com>
References: <540CA9B2.3090807@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:42:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CADZyTkno_g0DaHgQ6cnx5HFcQS-XWVz3c_bonZgCHgz=GFnr0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7ba97a801674dc05029d1202"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/NV7pWBTwikLxrq93xqjvU8fcv74
Cc: ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Call for adoption: The NULL Authentication Method in IKEv2 Protocol
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 07:42:04 -0000

Hi,

I am in favor of adopting this draft. In my case I see it as a way to ease
IPsec deployment in IoT with opportunistic encryption.

BR,
Daniel

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear working group,
>
> This is a call for adopting draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth as a WG
> document. Please respond to this mail with a Yes or No and a short
> rationale, at latest by Friday Sep. 12.
>
> Thanks,
>         Yaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>



-- 
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58