Re: [IPsec] New draft on IKE Diffie-Hellman checks

[Tero Kivinen <[e-mail]>]

Yaron Sheffer writes:
> note that this discussion is still a bit tentative, as we are working 
> with Sean to add the "DH checks" draft into our charter. But anyway...
> 
> For formal reasons, I would like to avoid a dependency from "DH Checks" 
> on Brainpool. So the better option is #2: have Brainpool I-Ds refer to 
> our I-D in their IANA Considerations.

Ups, I misread the previous comment. I meant that the new brainpool
etc drafts should have normative reference to the DH checks draft, not
the other way around. There is no need to change the DH checks draft
to include reference to the new drafts as that would lock those two
drafts together, neither can go forward without the other. The
brainpool draft can just write in its IANA considerations section that
this document adds these groups, and these are the checks that needs
to be done for them (i.e. what to put in the DH checks column etc).

So I agree with Yaron about this...
-- 
[e-mail]