Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns

Hi,

I would add/change just few words:
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 16:09 -0500, ext Scott W Brim wrote:
> On 01/03/2006 13:21 PM, Kurt Erik Lindqvist allegedly wrote:
> > Scott, as for your comment on the starting paragraph, I just had that 
> > as a place holder, I thought you had something for that?
> 
> You have:
> 
>   The IETF / IAB has through the IAB liasion to Q.9/13, Scott Brim,
>   received a general question on the future development of IPv6 in the
>   IETF. The IAB/IETF has split this into a number of sub areas that we
>   believe will be of interest and relevance to the work of Q9/13.
> 
> I suggest:
> 
>   The IETF has received your liaison asking for information on the
>   further development of IPv6 in the IETF.  The IETF has split
>   this into a number of sub-areas that we believe will be of interest
>   and relevance to the work of Q.9/13.

"The IETF thanks the Q.9/13 for their liaison statement and interest on
IPv6 issues related to NGN. We have reviewed the liaison statement
between the most relevant experts and prepared the response based on
those experts' comments. We have split... (Scott's original text)"

And then possibly to then end:

"IETF appreciates the interest of Q.9/13 and the good cooperation
between ITU and the IETF. We are delighted to cooperate and are looking
forward for further questions and input regarding the IETF technical
work."

It is not really that important, but these groups often like the little
headers and footers of chit-chat in their LSes... ;)

Cheers,

Jonne.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipv6-dir mailing list
> ipv6-dir@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir

_______________________________________________
ipv6-dir mailing list
ipv6-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir