Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns
"Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com> Wed, 04 January 2006 11:07 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eu6UJ-0008K9-GQ; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 06:07:27 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eu6UH-0008K4-Ab for ipv6-dir@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 06:07:25 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA13643 for <ipv6-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 06:06:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eu6Zk-00033A-7A for ipv6-dir@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 06:13:04 -0500
Received: from mgw-ext04.nokia.com ([131.228.20.96]) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Eu6UF-0000mg-RP for ipv6-dir@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 06:07:23 -0500
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext04.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k04B5b8o006737; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:05:39 +0200
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:07:10 +0200
Received: from esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:07:10 +0200
Received: from 172.21.154.117 ([172.21.154.117]) by esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:07:10 +0000
Received: from essrv103nok155120.ntc.nokia.com by esebe100.noe.nokia.com; 04 Jan 2006 13:07:09 +0200
Subject: Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns
From: "Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>
To: ext Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <16D82493-E9E7-45AB-901B-61CB0AE62506@kurtis.pp.se>
References: <C86180A8C204554D8A3323D8F6B0A29FB57A7B@dhost002-46.dex002.intermedia.net> <16D82493-E9E7-45AB-901B-61CB0AE62506@kurtis.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: NET/ST/IED
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 13:07:09 +0200
Message-Id: <1136372829.4857.38.camel@essrv103nok155120.ntc.nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-16.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2006 11:07:10.0499 (UTC) FILETIME=[022FE730:01C6111F]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c3a18ef96977fc9bcc21a621cbf1174b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Loughney (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) John" <john.loughney@nokia.com>, Andersson Loa <loa@pi.se>, ipv6-dir@ietf.org, Scott Brim W <sbrim@cisco.com>, Margaret Wasserman <MRW@devicescape.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IPv6 Directorate <ipv6-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, I went through quickly the proposed Liaison Statement (LS) to ITU-T from Kurtis. I was wondering a couple of things: 1) Who is going to edit it into a proper LS format? Kurtis? 2) It would be good to have the references and pointers to exact documents the LS is talking about. I think it would be helpful for the ITU-T people Please, let me know if I can help! Cheers, Jonne. On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 10:52 +0100, ext Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > On 8 nov 2005, at 18.59, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > > > > Is this something that the IPv6 directorate could prepare a > > response to? > > Any volunteers to take the lead on getting this together? > > > > Margaret > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott W Brim [mailto:sbrim@cisco.com] > > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 1:17 PM > > To: 'Margaret Wasserman' > > Subject: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns > > > > Hi Margaret. Please either (1) tell me which WGs or ADs to direct > > this to, or (2) compile a list of RFCs/drafts yourself. I'm grateful. > > After we have a list I'll draft up a liaison for you. > > > > These are some specific things that Q.9/13 is concerned about. What > > the IETF should do is to send them a list of the relevant drafts and > > RFCs, showing them how these issues are being addressed. > > > > I would do this myself but I'm not an IPv6 expert and I know I'll miss > > something. All we need is a list. > > > > - QoS signaling. They want to be sure that they can efficiently use > > both the the transport signaling protocols (such as RSVP and NSIS) > > and the application signaling protocols (such as SIP) in an IPv6 > > environment. Relevant RFCs/drafts are those about how those > > protocols work over IPv6. > > > > - QoS signaling interworking, IPv4<->IPv6. > > > > - General IPv4-IPv6. They are wondering under what conditions > > application level gateways will be required. > > > > - Also list the structure of the flow label. They are very interested > > in what it can be used for. > > > > - Multihoming with IPv6. Nothing surprising here -- just list the > > latest cool stuff for multihoming (both site and host). They like > > SCTP. > > > > - Mobility. > > > > - MPLS and IPv6. > > > Ok attached is what I have written so far. Apologies for the Word > format. I think John has been volunteered (and agreed to) to write > the text on QoS and signalling. I think he might want to read what I > wrote on the flow-label use as well. Loa has said he could write > something on the MPLS bullet, but I have not yet got any text from > him. Perhaps someone else in here can contribute? As for the ALG use, > I didn't write much but my personal opinions. Not sure of the rest of > the ipv6-dir want to add more. Last, if someone on ipv6-dir could > write something on mobility that would be great. It occurred to me > that we have a mobility directorate and I am sure they can write that > better than me anyway :-). > > I'd be happy to write more if needed. As for the format and text etc, > I am sure Scott can make that look as it should. > > Last question, if this is a lisaon statement, I guess we want to send > it pass the IAB as well. > > - kurtis - > _______________________________________________ ipv6-dir mailing list ipv6-dir@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir _______________________________________________ ipv6-dir mailing list ipv6-dir@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Allison Mankin
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Allison Mankin
- [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- RE: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Margaret Wasserman
- [ipv6-dir] Re: FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- RE: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns john.loughney