Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns
Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Mon, 02 January 2006 19:07 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EtV1e-0003QQ-Dy; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 14:07:22 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EtV1b-0003QI-PR for ipv6-dir@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 14:07:20 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA03241 for <ipv6-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:06:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EtV6j-0001lw-2d for ipv6-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 14:12:38 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Jan 2006 11:07:10 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,322,1131350400"; d="scan'208"; a="18683585:sNHT23979664"
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k02J703p011391; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:07:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:07:01 -0500
Received: from [10.86.242.118] ([10.86.242.118]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:07:01 -0500
Message-ID: <43B979D4.8070102@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 14:07:00 -0500
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 Thunderbird/1.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns
References: <C86180A8C204554D8A3323D8F6B0A29FB57A7B@dhost002-46.dex002.intermedia.net> <16D82493-E9E7-45AB-901B-61CB0AE62506@kurtis.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <16D82493-E9E7-45AB-901B-61CB0AE62506@kurtis.pp.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2006 19:07:01.0366 (UTC) FILETIME=[B60E1160:01C60FCF]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: fb6060cb60c0cea16e3f7219e40a0a81
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Loughney (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) John" <john.loughney@nokia.com>, Andersson Loa <loa@pi.se>, ipv6-dir@ietf.org, Margaret Wasserman <MRW@devicescape.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IPv6 Directorate <ipv6-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Hi. The best possible time to get this liaison in would be January 4th. How is it coming? On 12/21/2005 04:52 AM, Kurt Erik Lindqvist allegedly wrote: > > On 8 nov 2005, at 18.59, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > >> >> Is this something that the IPv6 directorate could prepare a response to? >> Any volunteers to take the lead on getting this together? >> >> Margaret >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Scott W Brim [mailto:sbrim@cisco.com] >> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 1:17 PM >> To: 'Margaret Wasserman' >> Subject: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns >> >> Hi Margaret. Please either (1) tell me which WGs or ADs to direct >> this to, or (2) compile a list of RFCs/drafts yourself. I'm grateful. >> After we have a list I'll draft up a liaison for you. >> >> These are some specific things that Q.9/13 is concerned about. What >> the IETF should do is to send them a list of the relevant drafts and >> RFCs, showing them how these issues are being addressed. >> >> I would do this myself but I'm not an IPv6 expert and I know I'll miss >> something. All we need is a list. >> >> - QoS signaling. They want to be sure that they can efficiently use >> both the the transport signaling protocols (such as RSVP and NSIS) >> and the application signaling protocols (such as SIP) in an IPv6 >> environment. Relevant RFCs/drafts are those about how those >> protocols work over IPv6. >> >> - QoS signaling interworking, IPv4<->IPv6. >> >> - General IPv4-IPv6. They are wondering under what conditions >> application level gateways will be required. >> >> - Also list the structure of the flow label. They are very interested >> in what it can be used for. >> >> - Multihoming with IPv6. Nothing surprising here -- just list the >> latest cool stuff for multihoming (both site and host). They like >> SCTP. >> >> - Mobility. >> >> - MPLS and IPv6. > > > > Ok attached is what I have written so far. Apologies for the Word > format. I think John has been volunteered (and agreed to) to write the > text on QoS and signalling. I think he might want to read what I wrote > on the flow-label use as well. Loa has said he could write something on > the MPLS bullet, but I have not yet got any text from him. Perhaps > someone else in here can contribute? As for the ALG use, I didn't write > much but my personal opinions. Not sure of the rest of the ipv6-dir > want to add more. Last, if someone on ipv6-dir could write something on > mobility that would be great. It occurred to me that we have a mobility > directorate and I am sure they can write that better than me anyway :-). > > I'd be happy to write more if needed. As for the format and text etc, I > am sure Scott can make that look as it should. > > Last question, if this is a lisaon statement, I guess we want to send > it pass the IAB as well. > > - kurtis - _______________________________________________ ipv6-dir mailing list ipv6-dir@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Allison Mankin
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Allison Mankin
- [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- RE: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Margaret Wasserman
- [ipv6-dir] Re: FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Scott W Brim
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
- RE: [ipv6-dir] FW: ITU-T Q.9/13 IPv6 concerns john.loughney