Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109

[Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:58 PM Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:35 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gyan,
>>
>> > As we have had thus far and ongoing quite a bit of discussion on
>> variable slaac can we add this to the agenda.  We can also expand the scope
>> of discussion as to all use cases related to slaac longer prefix lengths
>> and how it can be beneficial per the “Extending a /64” new thread.  I can
>> start the discussion and we can take it from there.
>>
>> The "Extending a /64" thread (which I in hindsight see is poorly named)
>> is not about longer prefix lengths.
>> It is about exploring solutions to the problem of extending a network
>> assigned with a single /64 with multiple links.
>
>
>     Gyan> Agreed but G-Extend the 64 bit boundary
>
>>
>>
>> <chair-hat>Bob and I had a discussion with the chairs of v6ops, where we
>> agreed to have the "what is the operational problem" discussion over in
>> v6ops.</chair-hat>.
>
>
>     Gyan> Sounds good.  Will have the draft authors join in on the
> discussion.
>

    Should I put together a presentation for the discussion or will it be
ad-hoc.

>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Ole
>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD