Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sun, 08 November 2020 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AB03A09D8; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 12:02:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sg3Si4EBHAQ1; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 12:02:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3A33A09EC; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 12:02:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id t15so2149883ual.6; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:02:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=St4v9Mr28DYNmdkefoZnz0iSCLfSU/1TpZRmQWivJVM=; b=Wpa8UzgEguxvh9rk/JwApsFIyoAYmpcoIe1h3oqNnwt+D40zaR0zYOaw1DHTe7CJzJ 3mysgZzpQdWDHjkCRmhEA+GnCODaEM9BZ1sF8MZ7F81Uw9Qrg++UfWaXhmhzM1wKHjXV tAxdc5/T3mQY0ghLHTaLqgahSjAEfAuFRe02vFJ9SzFpf8SSwt/URPp21m7AF8aC8tOt QYn3HmO0gGeE6oeESnYQtlYas3gAfG64sBT7gTjg/Ep08+zxH0/qDg9eB5ymTkmTbd36 15lqvp41mbG6P5iU0r/M0aTQI49Zf6Vg5WiIe+WQFz3RZMo43V+gQAXzrKVEOuXv3ynP dn+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=St4v9Mr28DYNmdkefoZnz0iSCLfSU/1TpZRmQWivJVM=; b=lxxy/Ajf5HoKoDC2k38mc23b1ODUKhQcy4ydG6vJVRff7XbEF1fpwk5L9E53tnftQX uEaXIdHTPG3/NwVMd6GkfVDTNL9ftsxV77fCgD5MZc++sJoFKQgsrNmM88nWqvPbu3My L9ivpx6USClWZCh4zFKDS2QIPcEe0Su3UGAP2fOJRmUPiERsmRC+SU+Gz8UK91XHoRbU 1PqSVPi69Ta68ymvpiq3ZhsrZHzoxUVDJ2QZlGeRuKXng53kgnsG3XeFpB493kP7n8H9 u1wGQPaCYr8S5PXpoay98EIM54FSFTujacphy0e6Yguf5E2Re6nfmrAmGmbNUbiJyDHE Ed7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GaSqskIaUPs1zlzVnbsLpF1aE6zmlW24Y/m16xek6fPvLIET/ xcYX/JIVw8EmubwVRNG3bavn9M56X94tEE81+JDuJY9Jgyj07A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKTNPSooTH3aiUO6cv1Kb6Ci0Qvc3rGxH6McaZdCKWLg4uuCK+mdk+ewCCKLmK4f68xun8S0XQWF8k//D+P4A=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:48ae:: with SMTP id x43mr5250639uac.114.1604865724753; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:02:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV3yxvK-ukHxe9Abaso1daVKO1qreFxiQ981=S0gBPorqA@mail.gmail.com> <1A06280C-97EE-4B0A-9E71-ACAAFEA37399@employees.org> <CABNhwV2kZhZ6+CsyG-qMdNWyzefhCjpJ6MCrJty8quGA1tMZog@mail.gmail.com> <32b092f1-cb36-a3cc-ca47-ae8edf45e780@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <32b092f1-cb36-a3cc-ca47-ae8edf45e780@gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 15:01:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV1mDZt-yEvVt88v84M_4+E29wT5YtUdxadjPkYKX6612A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006fa99105b39debd4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/uyRByLzzjPT1eJO-yJoMU_j3o28>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 20:02:08 -0000

So we are already on the agenda for v6ops.

Great!

Gyan
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 2:21 PM Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> (for my part, I think v6ops WG already has the problem statement draft
> in the agenda; it was posted
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/109/agenda/agenda-109-v6ops-04)
>
> For more precision, the title in the agenda would add  '... - A Problem
> Statement'.
>
> So I think it's fine there.
>
> Alex
>
> Le 08/11/2020 à 20:06, Gyan Mishra a écrit :
> >
> > Fred & Ron
> >
> > See thread below.  Should I put together a presentation for v6ops per
> > below to review the problem.
> >
> > Gyan
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 1:16 PM Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org
> > <mailto:otroan@employees.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     I would expect the v6ops chairs would like a presentation, but let
> >     me not presuppose how they want to run that session.
> >
> >     Cheers
> >     Ole
> >
> >>     On 8 Nov 2020, at 19:00, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com
> >>     <mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     
> >>
> >>
> >>     On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:58 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com
> >>     <mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:35 PM <otroan@employees.org
> >>         <mailto:otroan@employees.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>             Hi Gyan,
> >>
> >>             > As we have had thus far and ongoing quite a bit of
> >>             discussion on variable slaac can we add this to the
> >>             agenda.  We can also expand the scope of discussion as to
> >>             all use cases related to slaac longer prefix lengths and
> >>             how it can be beneficial per the “Extending a /64” new
> >>             thread.  I can start the discussion and we can take it
> >>             from there.
> >>
> >>             The "Extending a /64" thread (which I in hindsight see is
> >>             poorly named) is not about longer prefix lengths.
> >>             It is about exploring solutions to the problem of
> >>             extending a network assigned with a single /64 with
> >>             multiple links.
> >>
> >>
> >>             Gyan> Agreed but G-Extend the 64 bit boundary
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>             <chair-hat>Bob and I had a discussion with the chairs of
> >>             v6ops, where we agreed to have the "what is the
> >>             operational problem" discussion over in v6ops.</chair-hat>.
> >>
> >>
> >>             Gyan> Sounds good.  Will have the draft authors join in on
> >>         the discussion.
> >>
> >>
> >>         Should I put together a presentation for the discussion or
> >>     will it be ad-hoc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>             Best regards,
> >>             Ole
> >>
> >>         --
> >>
> >>         <http://www.verizon.com/>
> >>
> >>         *Gyan Mishra*
> >>
> >>         /Network Solutions A//rchitect /
> >>
> >>         /M 301 502-1347
> >>         13101 Columbia Pike
> >>         <
> https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike+Silver+Spring,+MD?entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>
> >>         /Silver Spring, MD
> >>         <
> https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike+Silver+Spring,+MD?entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>     --
> >>
> >>     <http://www.verizon.com/>
> >>
> >>     *Gyan Mishra*
> >>
> >>     /Network Solutions A//rchitect /
> >>
> >>     /M 301 502-1347
> >>     13101 Columbia Pike
> >>     <
> https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike+Silver+Spring,+MD?entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>
> >>     /Silver Spring, MD
> >>     <
> https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike+Silver+Spring,+MD?entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>
> >>
> > --
> >
> > <http://www.verizon.com/>
> >
> > *Gyan Mishra*
> >
> > /Network Solutions A//rchitect /
> >
> > /M 301 502-1347
> > 13101 Columbia Pike
> > /Silver Spring, MD
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD